Shedding some light on the dot product

AI Thread Summary
The dot product of two vectors A and B is commutative, meaning A . B equals B . A. When finding the components of vector V in the direction of vector W, the order of the vectors in the dot product does not matter. However, to determine the component of V along W, one must multiply V by the unit vector of W, not just use the dot product. The magnitude of this projection is calculated as V . W divided by the magnitude of W. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing vector components in geometry.
cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3
The dot product A . B is the magnitude of vector A times the projection of B onto A.

B . A is the magnitude of vector B times the projection of A onto B.

Correct?

A . B = B . A and this makes sense. But, say you're trying to find the components of a vector V in the direction of a vector W. Would it matter whether or not you wrote V . W or W . V?

EDIT: Also, does anyone know what it means (geometrically speaking) to find the components of a vector in the direction of another vector? I can give an example from a book if needed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To the first question, no it wouldn't matter. The dot product is commutative so ##\vec{V} \cdot \vec{W} = \vec{W} \cdot \vec{V}## for any vectors V and W.

To the edit, imagine you have your vector lying in the plane. Now imagine it is the hypotenuse of a right triangle where one of the sides of the triangle is parallel to the x-axis and the other side is parallel to the y-axis. The component of the main vector (which remember is represented as the hypotenuse) in the x direction is the length of the side of the triangle parallel to the x-axis, and the same for the y direction.
 
cytochrome said:
The dot product A . B is the magnitude of
A . B = B . A and this makes sense. But, say you're trying to find the components of a vector V in the direction of a vector W. Would it matter whether or not you wrote V . W or W . V?

It does not matter which way you write. But none of them will give you the component of V along the direction of W.
You need to multiply V by the unit vector along W.
So the magnitude of the projection is given by V.W/W
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top