Register to reply

What is the divergence of a unit vector not in the r direction?

by SiggyYo
Tags: direction, divergence, unit, vector
Share this thread:
Feb1-13, 01:44 PM
P: 5
Hi guys,

I've run across a problem. In finding the potential energy between two electrical quadrupoles, I've come across the expression for the energy as follows:

[itex]U_{Q}=\frac{3Q_{0}}{4r^{4}}\left[(\hat{k}\cdot \nabla)(5(\hat{k}\cdot \hat{r})^3-2(\hat{k}\cdot \hat{r})^2-(\hat{k}\cdot \hat{r}))\right],[/itex]

where [itex]\hat{k}[/itex] is the orientation of the quadrupoles, and [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] is the direction between the quadrupoles.

If I let [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] be in the [itex]\hat{z}[/itex]-direction, I get

[itex]U_{Q}=\frac{3Q_{0}}{4r^{4}}\left[(\hat{k}\cdot \nabla)(5(\cos{\theta})^3-2(\cos{\theta})^2-(\cos{\theta}))\right].[/itex]

My problem now is, that I don't know what to do about the divergence of the [itex]\hat{k}[/itex]-vector. I would like to do the differentiation in cartesian coordinates, but have them translated into spherical polar coordinates. I know, that the result should probably involve a [itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex]-factor, but I can't seem to do it right. I've tried to rewrite [itex]\hat{k}[/itex] in polar coordinates and tried using the chain rule on the derivative, but I get 3 as an answer. So I don't know if the initial expression is wrong, or I just dont know how to take the derivative. Can anyone please help?

Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Climate change increases risk of crop slowdown in next 20 years
Researcher part of team studying ways to better predict intensity of hurricanes
New molecule puts scientists a step closer to understanding hydrogen storage
Feb1-13, 10:30 PM
P: 4,572
Hey SiggyYo.

Have you tried representing a transformation between spherical and cartesian?

(Example: for (r,theta) -> (x,y) we have y/x = arctan(theta) and x^2 + y^2 = r^2 which can be used to get (x,y)).
Feb2-13, 10:47 AM
P: 5
Thank you chiro for the quick response.

I am afraid I don't know what you mean. Wouldn't I just obtain the usual

Also, I want [itex]\hat{k}[/itex] to be a unit vector, which gives me [itex]r=1[/itex]. How do I take this into account, when trying to get a result with a factor of [itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex]? I am really lost on this one :P

Feb2-13, 08:26 PM
P: 4,572
What is the divergence of a unit vector not in the r direction?

If k is a unit vector, then I don't think you will have any extra terms.

I'm not really sure what you are doing or trying to say: you have a conversion from polar to R^3 and provided the formula is correct, you should be able to plug these definitions in.

Also is the r term in your equation related to some vector in polar or is it some other variable?

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is it valid to subtract a position vector of direction E with one of direction W? General Physics 6
Unit vector in direction of max increase of f(x,y,z) Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Vector Calc Homework Help! Divergence Free Vector Fields Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Divergence and Curl of Unit Vectors? Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Check Divergence Theorem on Unit Cube Calculus & Beyond Homework 2