What is the difference between bulk, cluster, and molecule in material science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter assed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule
assed
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
I often find those terms when dealing with material science but I can't teel precisely the difference or the definition of which of these terms. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried to look them up?
The meanings are quite different so should be little ground for confusion.

For me it's not clear what your problem is actually.
You read about material science and are confused about "molecule"?
 
Well...your answer was not helpfull at all. Of course I tried to look them up before asking here. I never said I was confused about molecules, what I meant is that I cannot precisely determine what tells the diference between a cluster and a molecule. Besides that what i understand when I hear bulk is that we're talking about the internal part of the compound, not dealing with surface. Well, now that I explained myself better maybe someone could see what my problem is and help me.
 
Your explanation was helpful though. :smile:

In my understanding, a cluster is an aggregate of atoms or molecules so that the properties are somehow between these of the single molecules and those of a macroscopic solid (bulk).
But I suppose you know this already.

A similar problem is maybe defining what makes a particle a "nanoparticle".
They have some "special" properties. For example superficial phenomena becomes important. Or magnetic nano particles do not break into domains like bulk ferromagnets.
The specific size may depend on the material and the properties under study.

So clusters may be made from a few atoms up to thousands, maybe more.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top