Book Where to find famous maths books?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlexVGheo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Books
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on locating a copy of Diophantus's Arithmetica that includes Fermat's commentaries, specifically the 1670 edition published by Fermat's son, Samuel. This edition features the original Greek text alongside a Latin translation and contains Fermat's Latin commentaries. While the Arithmetica has been translated multiple times, it remains unclear if Samuel's edition has been fully translated into English. Additionally, all of Fermat's surviving works were compiled and published in French over a century ago, with a more recent book about his career released in 1994. The thread highlights the challenge of finding specific historical mathematical texts and their translations.
AlexVGheo
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have read a lot of mathematics history like S. Hollingdale's Maker's of Mathematics and pop-maths like Simon Singh's Fermat's Last Theorem etc. And from these I found references to other, historic/inspiring, mathematical works like Euclid's Elements and A Mathematician's Apology and so forth which I consequently read, but there is one work that I cannot find on the internet! I want a copy of Diophantus's Arithmatica, moreover I want a copy that has Fermat's commentaries in it...

So my question is where can I find it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fermat' son Samuel published an edition of Diophantine's Arithmetica in 1670 after his father's death. This edition contained the text of the Arithmetica in the original Greek with a parallel translation in Latin. Fermat's commentaries are also printed in the text where presumably they were originally found. These commentaries are written in Latin. The edition on which Fermat made his comments was Bachet's, printed in 1621. The actual volume owned by Fermat is now lost, so the 1670 edition printed by his son is the earliest copy containing his father's notations.

A copy of the actual section containing the famous Last Theorem can be seen here:

http://math.wallawalla.edu/conferences/TomAndKen/presentations/outlines/kleiji.pdf
 
Very good, it is exactly the book I was looking for. But does that mean no one has translated Samule's publicationm to English?
 
IDK if anyone has translated the entire composite work. Certainly, the Arithmetica has been translated several times. As for Fermat's scribblings, I'm not sure.

All of Fermat's surviving work was collected and printed in France (in French naturellement) more than a century ago. There is a more recent book about his mathematical career which was printed in 1994.

See:
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9780817682675-c1.pdf

Specifically, Refs. 26 and 35 at the end.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
177
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top