Fields Medal 2014 to Maryam Mirzakhani

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields
AI Thread Summary
Maryam Mirzakhani has made history as the first woman to win the Fields Medal, often regarded as the "Nobel Prize of mathematics." Her groundbreaking work focuses on the dynamics and geometry of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces. Raised in Iran, she completed her undergraduate studies there before earning her doctorate at Harvard in 2004. In addition to Mirzakhani, three other mathematicians were recognized with the award in 2014, including Manjul Bhargava. This achievement highlights significant advancements in the field of mathematics and promotes diversity within it.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,366
Reaction score
7,201
Stanford professor Maryam Mirzakhani has become the first woman to win the prize [Fields Medal]. Per this profile in Quanta Magazine, Mirzakhani was raised and received her undergraduate degree in Iran before attending graduate school at Harvard, where she finished her doctoral thesis in 2004. She's won the Fields for her work with the "dynamics and geometry of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces"
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...dal_winner_maryam_mirzakhani_of_stanford.html


Stanford Report, August 12, 2014
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/august/fields-medal-mirzakhani-081214.html

Stanford's Maryam Mirzakhani wins Fields Medal

Maryam Mirzakhani is the first woman to ever win the Fields Medal – known as the "Nobel Prize of mathematics" – in recognition of her contributions to the understanding of the symmetry of curved surfaces.

http://www.mathunion.org/general/prizes/2014

There were three other winners.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ah, Manjul Bhargava finally won it. I was an avid follower of his worked Putnam solutions (along with Kiran Kedlaya and Lenny Ng).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top