| Thread Closed |
String Theory a Dead End? |
Share Thread |
| Jul18-05, 06:17 PM | #18 |
|
Recognitions:
|
String Theory a Dead End?
While much of the work of interest to mathematicians came from TQFT and Supersymmetric ideas in differential geometry, at least some comes from pure String theory. Not all of these are due to Witten.
Considerable work and understanding of Calabi Yau's topological features have been made possible somewhat miraculously through String theory. Also, relevance in problem solving w.r.t to noncommutative geometry and twistor theory --> Gauge theory seem to pop up here and there. I have no idea about the theories ultimate physical significance, but I do thing there is something rather deep involved in the mathematics going on, and the really bizarre coincidences and dualities that mysteriously emerge. For that reason, ST will remain an active mathematical subject. |
| Jul19-05, 11:00 AM | #19 |
|
|
plus this is roughly in line with what i hear other knowledgeable people saying---namely that as physics it might or might not be a dead end, but as mathematics it evidently is not. You mention a couple of other physics lines that have enriched mathematics as well: topological quantum field theory and supersymmetry in differential geometry. |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: String Theory a Dead End?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Not Even Wrong? I Thought String Theory Was Dead? | Beyond the Standard Model | 8 | ||
| Introductory Interactive Online String Theory Seminar at the String Coffee Table | Beyond the Standard Model | 0 | ||
| Why is LQG a dead end but not m-theory? | Beyond the Standard Model | 36 | ||
| How does string field theory differ from string theory | Beyond the Standard Model | 17 | ||