Shape of Potential & Wave Vector 'K': Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter photon79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials Shapes
photon79
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
shapes of potentials!

Hi all..

1)we have,for example,rectangular, square well, well type etc potentials. How is the shape of a potential is determined? What is the shape of the nucleus potential?

2)I am unable to get the physical importence of the wave vector 'K' and K-space in band theory!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
photon79 said:
1) What is the shape of the nucleus potential?
In light nuclei it as approximately parabolic.

In heavy nuclei (uranium), alpha particles are often modeled as moving in a square well + Coulomb repulsion.
2)I am unable to get the physical importence of the wave vector 'K' and K-space in band theory!
Ask your teacher to explain it one more time.
 
The wave vector k is identically to: abs(k)=2pi/lambda and momentum=h(bar)k. So you can think of it as the inverse of the wave length of a wave. Its more confortable to write psy(x)=exp(kx) than psy(x)=exp(2pi/lambda*x).
If we work in more dimensions k must be a vector and as you can see in the wave function lambda must therefor also be a vector. And 2pi/VECTOR seems to look strange.

You see?
 
The k-vector gives the direction of wave propagation. The magnitude of k is proportional to the momentum of the wave, which as we know is related to the wavelength.

Claude.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top