- #1
samaank
- 15
- 0
Hi, i have a question, if we imaging that the universe is static and not expanding, what observation would be made in regards to red shifts in galaxy spectra?
The Static Universe Theory, also known as the Steady State Theory, is a cosmological model that suggests the universe has always existed in a static and unchanging state. This theory proposes that new matter is continuously being created to replace the matter that is lost as the universe expands.
The Static Universe Theory proposes that the red shifts in galaxy spectra are not caused by the expansion of the universe, but rather by a phenomenon known as tired light. This theory suggests that the light from distant galaxies becomes red shifted as it travels through space due to interactions with matter, rather than the Doppler effect caused by the galaxies moving away from us.
One of the main pieces of evidence for the Static Universe Theory is the observation of quasars, which are extremely bright and distant objects in the universe. According to this theory, quasars should not exist in an expanding universe, but their existence and distribution in the universe support the idea of a static universe.
One of the main criticisms of the Static Universe Theory is the lack of evidence for tired light and the inability to explain other observed phenomena, such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the abundance of light elements in the universe. Additionally, the theory does not account for the observed red shifts in the spectra of galaxies.
No, the Static Universe Theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community. In the 1960s, it was a popular alternative to the Big Bang Theory, but with more evidence supporting the Big Bang and its predictions, the majority of scientists now accept the Big Bang as the most accurate explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe.