Dwarf Galaxies Orbiting the Andromeda Galaxy unexplained by Dark matter

In summary: HI emission from dwarf galaxies in the MW. The globular clusters are also found to be co- concentrated with the HI emission peaks, which are located at the positions of the major N-body streams in the MW. Furthermore, the globular clusters are found to be co- concentrated with the HI emission peaks in the direction of the Galactic Center. These results suggest that the globular clusters and the HI emission peaks are associated with the major N-body streams in the MW. Our study provides evidence for the existence of a vast polar structure around the MW, which we call the VPOS.
  • #1
TrickyDicky
3,507
27
"A Vast Thin Plane of Co-rotating Dwarf Galaxies Orbiting the Andromeda Galaxy"
Published in Nature 3 days ago.

Rodrigo A. Ibata, Geraint F. Lewis, Anthony R. Conn, Michael J. Irwin, Alan W. McConnachie, Scott C. Chapman, Michelle L. Collins, Mark Fardal, Annette M. N. Ferguson, Neil G. Ibata, A. Dougal Mackey, Nicolas F. Martin, Julio Navarro, R. Michael Rich, David Valls-Gabaud, Lawrence M. Widrow
(Submitted on 3 Jan 2013)
Abstract
" Dwarf satellite galaxies are thought to be the remnants of the population of primordial structures that coalesced to form giant galaxies like the Milky Way. An early analysis noted that dwarf galaxies may not be isotropically distributed around our Galaxy, as several are correlated with streams of HI emission, and possibly form co-planar groups. These suspicions are supported by recent analyses, and it has been claimed that the apparently planar distribution of satellites is not predicted within standard cosmology, and cannot simply represent a memory of past coherent accretion. However, other studies dispute this conclusion. Here we report the existence (99.998% significance) of a planar sub-group of satellites in the Andromeda galaxy, comprising approximately 50% of the population. The structure is vast: at least 400 kpc in diameter, but also extremely thin, with a perpendicular scatter <14.1 kpc (99% confidence). Radial velocity measurements reveal that the satellites in this structure have the same sense of rotation about their host. This finding shows conclusively that substantial numbers of dwarf satellite galaxies share the same dynamical orbital properties and direction of angular momentum, a new insight for our understanding of the origin of these most dark matter dominated of galaxies. Intriguingly, the plane we identify is approximately aligned with the pole of the Milky Way's disk and is co-planar with the Milky Way to Andromeda position vector. The existence of such extensive coherent kinematic structures within the halos of massive galaxies is a fact that must be explained within the framework of galaxy formation and cosmology. "


Together with the papers by Kroupa and Pawlowski of 2012 that are cited in the article's bibliography, this foresees a deep crisis in the Dark matter models, what do you guys think?
BTW, one of the coauthors of this paper (Neil Ibata) is only 15 years old ,wow! Not many people can say they published in Nature at 15.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nice find! at the moment you don't have the arxiv link in your post, so I will contribute it
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0446

If you have a moment, could you explain in simple terms roughly why this leads to a crisis in DM models?

Here's a quote from the end of their "conclusions" section on page 6:

==quote 1301.0446==
... A further possibility is that we are witnessing accretion along filamentary structures that are fortuitously aligned. In-situ formation may be possible if the planar satellite galaxies formed like tidal-dwarf galaxies (TDG) in ancient gas-rich galaxy mergers7, but then the dwarf galaxies should be essentially devoid of dark matter. If the planar M31 dwarfs are dynamically-relaxed, the absence of dark matter would be greatly at odds with inferences from detailed observations25 of Milky Way satellites assuming the standard theory of gravity. An alternative possibility is that gas was accreted preferentially onto dark matter sub-halos that were already orbiting in this particular plane, but then the origin of the plane of sub-haloes would still require explanation. We conclude 6
that it remains to be seen whether galaxy formation models within the current cosmological framework can explain the existence of this vast, thin, rotating structure of dwarf galaxies within the halo of our nearest giant galactic neighbour.
==endquote==

What I'm thinking is that there may be some explanation within the domain of galaxy formation models that does not involve a crisis or disruption of our basic view of dark matter.
they seem to be thinking along those lines, but as yet have not come up with a plausible scenario.

You mentioned a Kroupa Pawlowski paper from 2012, in their references. I think this is it:
7. Pawlowski, M. S., Pflamm-Altenburg, J. & Kroupa, P. The VPOS: a vast polar structure of satellite galaxies, globular clusters and streams around the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 423, 1109–1126 (2012).

I will get a link.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5176
The VPOS: a vast polar structure of satellite galaxies, globular clusters and streams around the Milky Way
M. S. Pawlowski, J. Pflamm-Altenburg, P. Kroupa
(Submitted on 23 Apr 2012)
It has been known for a long time that the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW) show a significant amount of phase-space correlation, they are distributed in a highly inclined Disc of Satellites (DoS). We have extended the previous studies on the DoS by analysing for the first time the orientations of streams of stars and gas, and the distributions of globular clusters within the halo of the MW. It is shown that the spatial distribution of MW globular clusters classified as young halo clusters (YH GC) is very similar to the DoS, while 7 of the 14 analysed streams align with the DoS. The probability to find the observed clustering of streams is only 0.3 per cent when assuming isotropy. The MW thus is surrounded by a vast polar structure (VPOS) of subsystems (satellite galaxies, globular clusters and streams), spreading from Galactocentric distances as small as 10 kpc out to 250 kpc. These findings demonstrate that a near-isotropic infall of cosmological sub-structure components onto the MW is essentially ruled out because a large number of infalling objects would have had to be highly correlated, to a degree not natural for dark matter sub-structures. The majority of satellites, streams and YH GCs had to be formed as a correlated population. This is possible in tidal tails consisting of material expelled from interacting galaxies. We discuss the tidal scenario for the formation of the VPOS, including successes and possible challenges. The potential consequences of the MW satellites being tidal dwarf galaxies are severe. If all the satellite galaxies and YH GCs have been formed in an encounter between the young MW and another gas-rich galaxy about 10-11 Gyr ago, then the MW does not have any luminous dark-matter substructures and the missing satellites problem becomes a catastrophic failure of the standard cosmological model.
Comments: 21 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS. An animation of Figure 5 can be found at this http URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUwxv-WGfHM&feature=youtu.be
 
Last edited:
  • #3
marcus said:
Nice find! at the moment you don't have the arxiv link in your post, so I will contribute it
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0446

If you have a moment, could you explain in simple terms roughly why this leads to a crisis in DM models?
Well, the assessment of empirical findings always carries a bit of subjectiveness in the choice of words, but basically DM models can't account for the observed arrangement of dwarf galaxies in a plane around the big galaxy (first it was observed in the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way, and some attributed to pure chance, now its around Andromeda, using the same argument would be a bit of a stretch) without recurring to "fortuitous alignments", that seems as rigorous as trying to explain the anomalous velocity curves of outer stars in spiral galaxies itself as the result of fourtuitous alignments of stars.
The other alternative is to come up with such contrived models of galaxy formation that they lose all explanatory power.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Does the following contribute to higher velocities of stars and clusters at the outer edges of spiral galaxies?

When stars, clusters and matter first approach a galaxy, wouldn't they likely be traveling at higher velocities than the rotational velocities of the stars already in the galaxy. So as they merge, wouldn't they then tend to increase the rotational speed of the stars and clusters already there, starting with those at the rim edge, as well as slowing down themselves, all due to gravitational interaction?
 
Last edited:
  • #5


I find this research to be incredibly intriguing and thought-provoking. The discovery of a vast, thin plane of co-rotating dwarf galaxies orbiting the Andromeda galaxy challenges our current understanding of galaxy formation and the role of dark matter.

The fact that this structure is aligned with the Milky Way's disk and co-planar with the Milky Way-Andromeda position vector adds another layer of complexity to this discovery. It raises questions about the interactions and connections between these galaxies and the potential influence of their environment on their formation.

The fact that this finding is not predicted within standard cosmology and cannot be explained as a memory of past coherent accretion highlights the need for further research and a re-examination of our current models.

The involvement of a 15-year-old coauthor in this research is truly remarkable and a testament to the importance of encouraging and supporting young scientists. This discovery is a reminder that there is always more to learn and discover, and that science is a collaborative effort that can involve individuals of all ages and backgrounds.

Overall, this is an exciting and significant finding that opens up new avenues for understanding the formation and evolution of galaxies. It will be interesting to see how this discovery is further explored and incorporated into our current understanding of the universe.
 

1. What are dwarf galaxies?

Dwarf galaxies are small, faint galaxies that typically have less than a few billion stars. They are much smaller and less massive than the more well-known spiral and elliptical galaxies.

2. How do dwarf galaxies orbit the Andromeda Galaxy?

Dwarf galaxies orbit the Andromeda Galaxy due to the force of gravity. Just like how the Earth orbits the Sun, the dwarf galaxies orbit Andromeda due to its strong gravitational pull.

3. What is dark matter and how does it relate to dwarf galaxies?

Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that does not emit or absorb light, and therefore cannot be detected through traditional telescopes. However, it is believed to make up a significant portion of the total mass in the universe. Its presence is inferred through its gravitational effects on visible matter, such as dwarf galaxies.

4. Why are some dwarf galaxies orbiting the Andromeda Galaxy unexplained by dark matter?

Some dwarf galaxies seem to be orbiting the Andromeda Galaxy in ways that cannot be fully explained by the current understanding of dark matter. This could be due to the limitations of our current models, or it could indicate the presence of other unknown forces at play.

5. What are some proposed explanations for the unexplained dwarf galaxies?

Some theories suggest that the unexplained dwarf galaxies could be the result of interactions with other galaxies or dark matter subhalos. Others propose that the laws of gravity may need to be revised in order to fully explain the observations. Further research and observations are needed to better understand this phenomenon.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
8
Replies
264
Views
15K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top