Proof of Existence & Uniqueness of Rational Number y for xy = 2

In summary, the proof shows that if x is a nonzero rational number, there exists a unique rational number y such that xy = 2. This is proven by showing that the rational number y = 2/x is a solution for xy = 2, and by proving the uniqueness of this solution through the use of field properties.
  • #1
nicnicman
136
0
To get the following proof I followed another similar example, but I'm not sure if it's correct. Does this proof properly show existence and uniqueness?

Show that if x is a nonzero rational number, then there is a unique rational number y such that xy = 2

Solution:
Existence: The nonzero rational number y = 2/x is a solution of xy = 2 because x(2/x) = 2 = x(2/x) - 2 = x - x = 0.

Uniqueness: Suppose s is a nonzero rational number such that xs = 2. Then, xy =2 = xy - 2 = 0 and xs = 2 = xs - 2 = 0. Then:

xy - 2 = xs - 2
xy = xs
y = s

This would be a complete proof wouldn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It could be cleaner.

First of all, use -> instead of = (for implication) since
xy = 2 = xy - 2=0 is a contradiction. Whereas xy = 2 -> xy-2=0 works.

Second, for the first part. It is sufficient to say xy=2. That is, let y=2/x, then xy=(x)(2/x)=2. You must make the restriction x =/= 0.

Third, Try to prove the uniqueness part of the proof more cleanly. Think about what you've done versus xs=2 and what xy is.
 
  • #3
nicnicman said:
To get the following proof I followed another similar example, but I'm not sure if it's correct. Does this proof properly show existence and uniqueness?

Show that if x is a nonzero rational number, then there is a unique rational number y such that xy = 2

Solution:
Existence: The nonzero rational number y = 2/x is a solution of xy = 2 because x(2/x) = 2 = x(2/x) - 2 = x - x = 0.

Uniqueness: Suppose s is a nonzero rational number such that xs = 2. Then, xy =2 = xy - 2 = 0 and xs = 2 = xs - 2 = 0. Then:

xy - 2 = xs - 2
xy = xs
y = s

This would be a complete proof wouldn't it?

If you're allowed to use the field properties of the rationals, you can then also show that

multiplicative inverses are unique , so that :

xy=2 -> x-1xy=x-12 , so that y=2x-1 (by

commutativity).
 
Last edited:

1. What is the proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2?

The proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2 is based on the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that every positive integer can be uniquely represented as a product of primes. This theorem can be extended to rational numbers, where any rational number can be written as a product of prime numbers in its simplest form. Therefore, for the equation xy = 2, there exists only one rational number y that satisfies the equation.

2. How is the proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2 related to prime factorization?

As mentioned before, the proof is related to the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which is based on prime factorization. This theorem states that any positive integer can be uniquely represented as a product of prime numbers. In the case of rational numbers, this concept is extended, and the simplest form of a rational number is determined by its prime factorization. Therefore, for the equation xy = 2, the existence and uniqueness of rational number y depend on the prime factorization of 2.

3. Can the proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2 be applied to other equations?

Yes, the proof can be applied to other equations that involve rational numbers. As long as the equation follows the form xy = a, where a is a rational number, the proof can be used to determine the existence and uniqueness of y.

4. Is the proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2 a mathematical theorem or a scientific fact?

The proof is a mathematical theorem. It is a proven mathematical concept that follows logical reasoning and is accepted by the mathematical community. It is not considered a scientific fact as it does not pertain to the physical world, but rather to abstract mathematical concepts.

5. Can the proof of existence and uniqueness of rational number y for xy = 2 be easily understood by someone without a strong mathematical background?

The proof may be difficult for someone without a strong mathematical background to understand fully. It involves complex mathematical concepts and requires familiarity with mathematical notation and terminology. However, with some explanation and understanding of basic mathematical principles, the proof can be grasped by most individuals.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
597
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
240
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
938
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top