- #1
- 2,147
- 50
There are basically two options I am considering, a 4 year Physics course and a 4 year Math+Physics course. I want to be able to do theoretical work (i.e be competent in the mathematics that a theoretical physicist would be) but I don't want to throw out experimental work altogether. If I choose the Math+Phys course, there won't be any experimental modules. But I don't know whether the Physics course has all the math that I want to do. You can find course outlines of both here :
Physics ( MPhys )
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/courses/depta2z/physics/f300/
Maths and Physics (MMathPhys)
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/courses/depta2z/physics/gf13/#modules
If any of you theoretical physicists/physicists can tell me whether the straight physics MPhys course will disadvantage me too much (from learning the math necessary to be a theoretical physicist), I would be grateful.
Physics ( MPhys )
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/courses/depta2z/physics/f300/
Maths and Physics (MMathPhys)
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/courses/depta2z/physics/gf13/#modules
If any of you theoretical physicists/physicists can tell me whether the straight physics MPhys course will disadvantage me too much (from learning the math necessary to be a theoretical physicist), I would be grateful.