- #1
Nekromancer
- 1
- 0
Hi all,
New member here, found the forum when lurking around the 'net last night.
A very brief disclaimer: I've a Chemistry degree, I work with computers in the IT security field, but I am NOT a Physics expert... far from that.
I've read a lot of "popular" literature, and from my humble lack of knowledge of the physics of gravity and the mathematics involved, a bizarre idea was born.
Will try to explain it. I apologize in advance if my English is not good, it's not my native language.
I understood from my readings that gravity is a property, or is generated by matter. The mass of matter is in direct relation to it, etc. That's what everyone already knows.
Some literature mentions some hypothetical particles named gravitons, that should be responsible to carry gravitational force (I don't know if "carry" is the correct term, I hope you understand).
I've also read that gravity is always attractive.
On the experimental side, and only as far as I know, lone gravitons are still to be detected in the lab, and it's my guess that measuring the gravitational force of single gravitons won't be feasible (too small).
OK... let's suppose that antimatter doesn't generate gravitons, but it generates antigravitons.
I hear you saying "So what? Photons are their own antiparticle as well".
Yes... but let's suppose that antigravitons differ on a radical basis from gravitons, they are repulsive instead of attractive, and imagine the consequences of that (again, from my lack of knowledge of the subject).
One of the potential consequences will be that we won't see big bunches of antimatter in the Universe, because it will never condensate.
So far, I guess that there's no experimental argument AGAINST that (nor in favour, I'm afraid).
That will lead to big bunches of condensated matter (galaxies), in a big and ultra-low density sea of antimatter.
Antimatter in that scenario can provide the large-scale repulsion needed to expand the Universe.
We won't be able to see radiation coming from anihilation matter-antimatter from the boundaries of galaxies because it'll happen only a particle at a time or so, and the very small radiation generated can contribute to send the other particles of antimatter even further from the gravitational attraction of the galaxy.
Can that bizarre idea verified in the lab? Experimental physics cientists can generate small amounts of antimatter, but it's my guess (again!) that it won't be enough to verify if antigravitons are generated (currently, I think that we can't even check for the presence of gravitons, even when we have big bunches of matter to experiment with).
Don't ask me questions. That's the idea. I tried to expose it several times to people that were supposed to be involved in Physics in one way or another, and I didn't even got an answer back. "The scientific pride", I guess
Just want to know the impression of people here.
I'm not stubborn, if good arguments prove me wrong, I'll drop the idea for good
Thanks for your time!
Cheers,
Miguel
aka Nekromancer
New member here, found the forum when lurking around the 'net last night.
A very brief disclaimer: I've a Chemistry degree, I work with computers in the IT security field, but I am NOT a Physics expert... far from that.
I've read a lot of "popular" literature, and from my humble lack of knowledge of the physics of gravity and the mathematics involved, a bizarre idea was born.
Will try to explain it. I apologize in advance if my English is not good, it's not my native language.
I understood from my readings that gravity is a property, or is generated by matter. The mass of matter is in direct relation to it, etc. That's what everyone already knows.
Some literature mentions some hypothetical particles named gravitons, that should be responsible to carry gravitational force (I don't know if "carry" is the correct term, I hope you understand).
I've also read that gravity is always attractive.
On the experimental side, and only as far as I know, lone gravitons are still to be detected in the lab, and it's my guess that measuring the gravitational force of single gravitons won't be feasible (too small).
OK... let's suppose that antimatter doesn't generate gravitons, but it generates antigravitons.
I hear you saying "So what? Photons are their own antiparticle as well".
Yes... but let's suppose that antigravitons differ on a radical basis from gravitons, they are repulsive instead of attractive, and imagine the consequences of that (again, from my lack of knowledge of the subject).
One of the potential consequences will be that we won't see big bunches of antimatter in the Universe, because it will never condensate.
So far, I guess that there's no experimental argument AGAINST that (nor in favour, I'm afraid).
That will lead to big bunches of condensated matter (galaxies), in a big and ultra-low density sea of antimatter.
Antimatter in that scenario can provide the large-scale repulsion needed to expand the Universe.
We won't be able to see radiation coming from anihilation matter-antimatter from the boundaries of galaxies because it'll happen only a particle at a time or so, and the very small radiation generated can contribute to send the other particles of antimatter even further from the gravitational attraction of the galaxy.
Can that bizarre idea verified in the lab? Experimental physics cientists can generate small amounts of antimatter, but it's my guess (again!) that it won't be enough to verify if antigravitons are generated (currently, I think that we can't even check for the presence of gravitons, even when we have big bunches of matter to experiment with).
Don't ask me questions. That's the idea. I tried to expose it several times to people that were supposed to be involved in Physics in one way or another, and I didn't even got an answer back. "The scientific pride", I guess
Just want to know the impression of people here.
I'm not stubborn, if good arguments prove me wrong, I'll drop the idea for good
Thanks for your time!
Cheers,
Miguel
aka Nekromancer