What Is the Optimal Weight in a Linear Estimator to Minimize Mean Squared Error?

  • Thread starter purplebird
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Linear
In summary: Let me know if you have any further questions. In summary, we are trying to find the values of W(i) that will result in a minimum error between the estimated value of \mu and the true value of u. After deriving an expression for the weights, we found that W(i) = \frac{X(i)}{\sumX(i)^2} will minimize the error.
  • #1
purplebird
18
0

Homework Statement


Given
X(i) = u + e(i) i = 1,2,...N
such that e(i)s are statistically independent and u is a parameter
mean of e(i) = 0
and variance = [tex]\sigma(i)[/tex]^2

Find W(i) such that the linear estimator

[tex]\mu[/tex] = [tex]\sum[/tex]W(i)X(i) for i = 1 to N

has

mean value of [tex]\mu[/tex]= u

and E[(u- [tex]\mu[/tex])^2 is a minimum


The Attempt at a Solution



For a linear estimator:

W(i) = R[tex]^{}-1[/tex]b

where b(i)= E([tex]\mu[/tex](i) X(i)) and R(i) = E(X(i)X(j))

I do not know how to proceed beyond this. Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
.



Thank you for posting your question. I am a scientist and I would be happy to help you with your problem. Let's start by defining some terms in your problem. X(i) represents a set of N random variables, each with a mean of u and a variance of \sigma(i)^2. The variable u is a parameter that we are trying to estimate using a linear estimator, which is defined as \mu = \sumW(i)X(i). Our goal is to find the values of W(i) that will result in a minimum error between the estimated value of \mu and the true value of u.

To begin, we can rewrite the linear estimator as \mu = \sumW(i)(u + e(i)), since X(i) = u + e(i). Expanding this equation, we get \mu = u\sumW(i) + \sumW(i)e(i). We want the mean value of \mu to be equal to u, so we can set \sumW(i) = 1. This means that the weights must sum to 1.

Next, we can calculate the expected value of \mu using the linearity property of expected values:

E[\mu] = E[u\sumW(i) + \sumW(i)e(i)] = u\sumW(i) + \sumW(i)E[e(i)]

Since the mean of e(i) is 0, this simplifies to E[\mu] = u\sumW(i).

Now, let's look at the error between the estimated value of \mu and the true value of u. This is given by (u - \mu)^2. We want to minimize this error, so we can take the derivative of this expression with respect to W(i) and set it equal to 0:

\frac{d}{dW(i)}(u - \mu)^2 = -2(u - \mu)\frac{d\mu}{dW(i)} = -2(u - \mu)X(i)

Setting this equal to 0 and solving for W(i), we get W(i) = \frac{X(i)}{\sumX(i)^2}.

Therefore, the weights that will result in a minimum error between the estimated value of \mu and the true value of u are W(i) = \frac{X(i)}{\sumX(i)^2}.

I
 
  • #3
.

it is important to thoroughly understand the concepts and equations involved in any problem before attempting to solve it. In this case, the problem is asking for a linear estimator that will minimize the mean squared error between the estimated value, \mu, and the true value, u. To solve this, we first need to understand the concept of a linear estimator and how it is calculated.

A linear estimator is a method of predicting a value based on a linear combination of observed data. In this case, the observed data is represented by X(i) and the linear combination is represented by W(i). The goal is to find the values of W(i) that will give us the most accurate prediction of the true value, u.

To do this, we can use the method of least squares. This method involves minimizing the sum of the squared errors between the estimated value and the observed data. In other words, we want to minimize the function E[(u- \mu)^2]. To do this, we need to find the values of W(i) that will make this function as small as possible.

Using the equations provided in the problem, we can rewrite the function as:

E[(u- \mu)^2] = E[(u- \sumW(i)X(i))^2]

= E[(u- \sumW(i)(u + e(i)))^2]

= E[(\sumW(i)e(i))^2]

= \sumW(i)^2E[e(i)^2]

= \sumW(i)^2\sigma(i)^2

Now, to minimize this function, we need to take the derivative with respect to W(i) and set it equal to 0:

\frac{\partial E[(u- \mu)^2]}{\partial W(i)} = 2\sumW(i)\sigma(i)^2 = 0

Solving for W(i), we get:

W(i) = 0

This means that the linear estimator that will minimize the mean squared error is simply a constant value of 0. This may seem counterintuitive, but it is the result of the given information, where the mean of e(i) is 0 and the variance is \sigma(i)^2.

In conclusion, the linear estimator for this problem is W(i) = 0, which means that the estimated value, \mu, will always be equal to the true value, u. This is the best estimator we
 

1. What is a linear estimator?

A linear estimator is a statistical method used to predict the value of a dependent variable based on one or more independent variables. It assumes that there is a linear relationship between the variables and uses that relationship to make predictions.

2. How does a linear estimator work?

A linear estimator works by fitting a line to a set of data points in such a way that minimizes the distance between the line and the data points. This line is then used to make predictions for new data points based on their corresponding independent variable values.

3. What are the assumptions of a linear estimator?

The main assumptions of a linear estimator are that the relationship between the variables is linear, the errors in the data are normally distributed, and the errors have constant variance. Additionally, the independent variables should not be highly correlated with each other.

4. What is the difference between a linear estimator and a linear regression?

A linear estimator is a general term used to describe any method that predicts a dependent variable based on one or more independent variables. Linear regression is a specific type of linear estimator that uses the method of least squares to fit a line to the data. In other words, linear regression is a type of linear estimator, but not all linear estimators are linear regression.

5. When should I use a linear estimator?

A linear estimator is best used when there is a linear relationship between the variables and the data is normally distributed with constant variance. It can also be useful for making predictions when there is no prior knowledge about the relationship between the variables. However, if the assumptions of a linear estimator are not met, it may not be the most appropriate method to use.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
468
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
642
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
0
Views
143
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
481
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
665
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
848

Back
Top