Malus law in quantum mechanics

In summary, the intensity of light does not decrease when passing through a polarizer with a 45 degree angle from horizontal, as long as the light is polarized in the same direction. However, if the light is polarized perpendicularly, the intensity will decrease depending on the rotation angle of the object's polarization vector in the polarizer's basis. This can be calculated by exponentiating the angular momentum operators and using a quantum mechanics textbook for further information.
  • #1
AlexHT
13
0
Hi,

For example, if I were to send |y> = 1/sqrt{2}( |H> + |V> ) photons into a polarizer with a 45 degre angle from horizontal, would the beam loose intensity? How can I calculate it on my own?


EDIT: The picture below illustrate what is happening. I am changing the base from x-y to a diagonal base. Do I loose intensity?
 

Attachments

  • base.JPG
    base.JPG
    2.7 KB · Views: 479
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No. Or rather, it depends on which diagonal you're talking about. One will allow |H>+|V> through and completely block |H>-|V> ; the other will do the reverse. You can pretty much see what happens here just by looking at things: the lower-left to upper-right diagonal clearly corresponds to |H>+|V> -- that line is given by [tex]c (\hat{x}+\hat{y}) ,\ c \in R[/tex] after all -- and so a polarizer along that lines corresponds to a projection onto |H>+|V>. The intensity of light getting through is given by [tex] | <\mbox{light}|\mbox{polarizer}>|^2[/tex] where light is the normalized polarization vector of the light, and polarizer is the normalized vector of the polarizer.

In a more general situation -- I mean when you're dealing with polarization of objects which are not spin-1 like light -- what you'd want to do is rotate the object's polarization vector into the basis of the polarizer. To do this you need to know how the object transforms under rotations; that can be found by exponentiating the angular momentum operators (which are the generators of rotations.) If this sounds like gobbedy-gook, you can study a good (grad-level) quantum mechanics textbooks. They will go into this in some depth. IIRC Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics is particularly good on this topic. For a spin-m object polarized perpendicularly to the plane of the polarizer, this turns out to be pretty simple; you get roughly the same result as for light, except the rotation angle that shows up is proportional to m*theta, ie

[tex]|\mbox{rotated ket}> = \left( \begin{array}{cc} \cos(m\theta) & \sin(m\theta) \\ -\sin(m\theta) & \cos(m\theta) \end{array} \right) |\mbox{original ket}>[/tex]
 
  • #3


Malus law in quantum mechanics states that the intensity of a polarized light beam passing through a polarizer is proportional to the square of the cosine of the angle between the polarization direction of the light and the transmission axis of the polarizer. In the example you provided, the polarizer is at a 45 degree angle from the horizontal, which means that the intensity of the light beam will be reduced by a factor of 1/2 (since cos(45)^2 = 1/2). This means that the beam will lose intensity, but the exact amount can only be calculated by knowing the initial intensity of the beam and the properties of the polarizer.

To calculate the intensity loss on your own, you can use the equation I = I_0 cos^2(theta), where I is the final intensity, I_0 is the initial intensity, and theta is the angle between the polarization direction and the transmission axis. In your example, theta is 45 degrees, so the intensity loss would be I = (1/2)I_0.

I hope this helps clarify the application of Malus law in quantum mechanics. It is an important principle in understanding the behavior of polarized light in quantum systems.
 

1. What is Malus law in quantum mechanics?

Malus law in quantum mechanics is a principle that describes the relationship between the intensity of light passing through a polarizer and the angle of polarization. It states that the intensity of light after passing through the polarizer is proportional to the square of the cosine of the angle between the direction of polarization of the light and the axis of the polarizer.

2. How is Malus law derived in quantum mechanics?

To derive Malus law in quantum mechanics, we use the principles of quantum mechanics and the properties of polarized light. We start with the wave function of a photon, which describes its polarization state, and then use the Schrödinger equation to calculate the probability of measuring a certain polarization angle. By taking the square of the resulting probability, we obtain the intensity of light after passing through the polarizer, which is proportional to the square of the cosine of the angle.

3. What is the significance of Malus law in quantum mechanics?

Malus law is significant in quantum mechanics because it helps us understand the behavior of polarized light and its interaction with polarizing materials. It also has practical applications in various fields, such as optics, astronomy, and quantum computing, where the polarization of light is crucial in experiments and technologies.

4. Can Malus law be applied to other types of waves besides light?

Yes, Malus law can be applied to other types of waves besides light, such as electromagnetic waves, sound waves, and even quantum waves. As long as the wave has a polarization state, its intensity can be described by the cosine squared relationship with the polarizer angle, as stated in Malus law.

5. Are there any limitations to Malus law in quantum mechanics?

Yes, there are limitations to Malus law in quantum mechanics. It assumes that the polarizing material is perfectly aligned and that the light passing through it is unpolarized. In reality, there may be imperfections in the alignment of the polarizer, and the light may have some degree of polarization, which can affect the accuracy of Malus law's predictions.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
647
Replies
6
Views
419
Replies
0
Views
150
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top