Zeta regularization for UV divergences ?

In summary, Zeta regularization is a mathematical technique used to handle ultraviolet (UV) divergences in quantum field theory by replacing the sum of infinite terms with a value calculated using the Riemann zeta function. It works by subtracting the divergent terms from the zeta function value at s=1, resulting in a finite, regularized value. This method is commonly used in quantum field theory to make sense of infinities that arise in calculations of physical quantities due to the breakdown of approximations at high energies. Zeta regularization has advantages over other methods, such as being more rigorous and applicable to a wider range of systems, while also preserving symmetries and avoiding the introduction of unphysical parameters. However, it
  • #1
zetafunction
391
0
Zeta regularization for UV divergences ??

I know that zeta regularization makes sense but is this paper correct ?

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.2418.pdf

watched on arxiv by a chance, there are 2 sections the 'divergent integral' treatment by using zeta regularization is on section 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


http://www.scribd.com/doc/9650858 provided the same results.

i am not an expert but i think he is taking divergent series in order to obtain finite results is this acceptable ??
 
  • #3
, and the 'finite integral' treatment is on section 3

I cannot provide a definitive answer on whether or not the paper is correct without thoroughly reviewing and analyzing its contents. However, I can provide some general information about zeta regularization and its use for UV divergences.

Zeta regularization is a mathematical technique used to assign values to divergent integrals. These integrals often arise in quantum field theory, where they represent the sum of infinitely many terms that become infinitely large as the integration variable approaches a certain limit (in this case, the ultraviolet or UV limit). Zeta regularization assigns a finite value to these divergent integrals by using a mathematical function called the Riemann zeta function. This technique has been successfully used in various areas of physics, including quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity.

In regards to the paper in question, it is important to note that zeta regularization is just one of many techniques used to handle UV divergences. Other methods include dimensional regularization and cutoff regularization. Each method has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice of which method to use often depends on the specific problem at hand.

Without a thorough review of the paper, it is difficult to determine its accuracy. However, I would suggest looking at the authors' qualifications and the journal in which the paper was published to assess its credibility. Additionally, it is always important to critically evaluate any scientific paper and consider alternative viewpoints before drawing conclusions.
 
  • #4
.3, and the 'zeta regularization' is on section 3.


Zeta regularization is a mathematical technique used to handle divergent integrals or sums in physics and mathematics. It involves using the Riemann zeta function, which is defined for all complex numbers except 1 and has a pole at 1. This function has the property of assigning finite values to certain divergent integrals and sums.

In the context of UV divergences, which arise in quantum field theory, zeta regularization has been proposed as a method to handle these infinities. The paper in question discusses the use of zeta regularization in dealing with UV divergences in quantum gravity. It presents a method for evaluating the divergent terms in the partition function of a quantum gravitational theory using zeta regularization.

While zeta regularization may seem like a promising approach to handle UV divergences, it is important to note that it is not the only method available. Other techniques such as dimensional regularization and renormalization have also been used in the context of quantum field theory to deal with divergences.

As for the specific paper, it is always important to critically evaluate any scientific work. I would suggest looking at other sources and literature on zeta regularization and its application in quantum gravity to get a better understanding of its validity and effectiveness in handling UV divergences.
 

Related to Zeta regularization for UV divergences ?

1. What is Zeta regularization for UV divergences?

Zeta regularization is a mathematical technique used to handle ultraviolet (UV) divergences in quantum field theory. It involves replacing the sum of infinite terms in a series with a value calculated using the Riemann zeta function, which has a singularity at s = 1.

2. How does Zeta regularization work?

Zeta regularization works by subtracting the divergent terms in a series from the zeta function value at s=1. This allows for the calculation of a finite, regularized value for the series. This technique is commonly used in quantum field theory to make sense of infinities that arise in calculations of physical quantities.

3. What are UV divergences?

UV divergences refer to infinities that arise in quantum field theory calculations when the energy or momentum of a particle approaches infinity. This is due to the fact that quantum field theory is based on an approximation that breaks down at high energies, leading to divergent results. Zeta regularization is one method used to handle these divergences.

4. Why is Zeta regularization more useful than other methods for handling UV divergences?

Zeta regularization has several advantages over other methods for handling UV divergences, such as dimensional regularization. It is a more rigorous mathematical approach and can be applied to a wider range of physical systems. It also preserves important symmetries and does not introduce unphysical parameters.

5. Are there any limitations to using Zeta regularization for UV divergences?

While Zeta regularization is a useful tool for handling UV divergences, it does have some limitations. It can only be applied to certain types of divergences, and its results can depend on the specific regularization scheme chosen. Additionally, it does not provide physical insight into the underlying problem and is primarily a mathematical tool for obtaining finite results.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
583
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top