Should people who are carriers for genetic disease be allowed to procreate?

  • Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Disease
In summary: Sure, if we grew all our potatoes in a lab, we could probably engineer one that didn't brown when sliced, but that's not what we're trying to do. We're trying to produce a potato that tastes good, is nutritious, and has the same nutritional value as a natural potato.In summary, autosomal dominant diseases are a different issue, but many recessive disorders are thought to confer some advantage to carriers who are heterozygous but not homozygous for the mutant allele. Couples can be screened to see if they are carries for some of the same diseases, and in vitro fertilization may be possible to screen for embryos without the disease. The ethical concern is who defines 'genetic disease', and
  • #1
gravenewworld
1,132
26
Especially people who carry autosomal dominant horrific diseases like Huntington's disease. Should these people be allowed to procreate when there is an extremely high chance that their children will suffer from terrible disease in the future?
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Autosomal dominant diseases are a different issue, but many recessive disorders are thought to confer some advantage to carriers who are heterozygous but not homozygous for the mutant allele. The classic example is sickle cell anemia; people with only one copy of the sickle cell gene have an increased resistance to malaria.

Now, technology can help alleviate the problems associated with genetic disorders. For recessive disorders, couples can get screened to check whether they are carries for some of the same diseases and provide the necessary information if that does turn out to be the case. It may also be possible for couples at risk of producing an offspring with a genetic disease to perform in vitro fertilization and screen for embryos lacking the disease (of course, there are important ethical issues with screening embryos, but that's another topic entirely).

One important ethical concern regarding the problem is how are "genetic diseases" defined, and who defines them? Obviously there are some very horrible diseases like Huntington's disease and cystic fibrosis, but not all diseases are so bad. For example, would something relatively innocuous like color blindness be considered? What about something like phenylketonuria, which can cause severe problems if left untreated, but with treatment sufferers of the disease can live relatively normal lives?
 
  • #3
The problem here of course is that evolution is not a great chain of being and does not progress on a global scale. Something can only be said to be beneficial or deleterious compared to a specific environment. For instance, there is a very good reason why we don't just kill all 'natural' potatoes and put out an 'artificial' genetically engineered super potato.
 

1. Should people who are carriers for genetic disease be allowed to procreate?

This is a complex ethical question that has been debated by both scientists and the general public. Some argue that allowing carriers to procreate could result in passing on harmful genetic diseases to their offspring, while others argue that everyone has the right to have children regardless of their genetic status.

2. What is a carrier for a genetic disease?

A carrier is an individual who has one copy of a mutated gene for a genetic disease, but does not exhibit symptoms of the disease themselves. Carriers can pass on the mutated gene to their offspring, who may or may not develop the disease.

3. What are the risks of allowing carriers to procreate?

The main risk of allowing carriers to procreate is the possibility of passing on a genetic disease to their offspring. This can have serious health consequences for the child and future generations, as well as emotional and financial burdens for the family.

4. Are there any benefits to allowing carriers to procreate?

Some argue that allowing carriers to procreate can increase genetic diversity and may even lead to the development of new, beneficial genetic traits. Additionally, prohibiting carriers from procreating may be seen as a violation of their reproductive rights.

5. What are some potential solutions to this issue?

One solution is genetic testing and counseling, which can help carriers make informed decisions about their reproductive choices. Additionally, advances in genetic engineering technology may offer the possibility of editing out harmful genes before conception. Ultimately, the decision of whether carriers should be allowed to procreate is a complex ethical issue that requires careful consideration and discussion.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
15
Replies
516
Views
27K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
623
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Back
Top