- #1
aaaa202
- 1,169
- 2
Now, I know this has been discussed a few times, but I still don't get the proof of how p is a hermitian operator, so I thought someone might be able to help me. So i got this to start off with:
[tex]
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^\ast(x,t) (\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) \Psi(x,t) dx[/tex]
Which when using the integration by parts for me yields:
[tex]
[\frac{\hbar}{i}\Psi^\ast(x,t)\Psi(x,t)]^\infty_{-\infty}- \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi(x,t) (\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) \Psi^\ast(x,t) dx[/tex]
Now everyone else gets this in front of the integral:
[tex]\frac{\hbar}{i} [\Psi^\ast(x,t)\Psi(x,t)]^\infty_{-\infty}[/tex]
And i don't understand how. Do the bars with the limits represent an integral, or what do they represent? I'm not that good at maths so could someone step for step show how they get to there?
And if the bars represent and integral, why does it disappear as the wave functions tends to plus or minus inf? I thought a wave function integrated over the entire space had to yield 1.
[tex]
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^\ast(x,t) (\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) \Psi(x,t) dx[/tex]
Which when using the integration by parts for me yields:
[tex]
[\frac{\hbar}{i}\Psi^\ast(x,t)\Psi(x,t)]^\infty_{-\infty}- \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi(x,t) (\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) \Psi^\ast(x,t) dx[/tex]
Now everyone else gets this in front of the integral:
[tex]\frac{\hbar}{i} [\Psi^\ast(x,t)\Psi(x,t)]^\infty_{-\infty}[/tex]
And i don't understand how. Do the bars with the limits represent an integral, or what do they represent? I'm not that good at maths so could someone step for step show how they get to there?
And if the bars represent and integral, why does it disappear as the wave functions tends to plus or minus inf? I thought a wave function integrated over the entire space had to yield 1.
Last edited: