Measurement units and complex numbers.

In summary: But I think the consensus among physicists is that this is purely a mathematical curiosity, and doesn't actually exist.In summary, the conversation discusses a programming module for converting measurement units that will support complex numbers. The speaker asks questions about converting complex values and whether there are any measurement units that use complex conversion factors. The expert responds by explaining that complex numbers can be thought of as vectors and that there are no known units that require complex conversion factors. They also mention the concept of quaternions and a hypothetical particle with an imaginary mass.
  • #1
Orefa
91
0
I am programming a module used to convert measurement units. This will be part of a system that supports complex numbers. I never use complex numbers in my field but of course engineers and physicists do so I thought I should ask a couple of questions first.

Q1. Is there anything unusual about converting something like (5 + 2i) meters/sec into miles per hour? I think it is the same process as with plain old real numbers (multiply by ~2.237 in this particular case) but are there conditions specific to complex values and not reals?

Q2. Is there any mesurement unit(s) that uses a complex conversion factor instead of just a real ratio? In other words, would the software ever need to indicate a conversion ratio as a complex value instead of just a real?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Orefa said:
I am programming a module used to convert measurement units. This will be part of a system that supports complex numbers. I never use complex numbers in my field but of course engineers and physicists do so I thought I should ask a couple of questions first.

Q1. Is there anything unusual about converting something like (5 + 2i) meters/sec into miles per hour? I think it is the same process as with plain old real numbers (multiply by ~2.237 in this particular case) but are there conditions specific to complex values and not reals?

Q2. Is there any mesurement unit(s) that uses a complex conversion factor instead of just a real ratio? In other words, would the software ever need to indicate a conversion ratio as a complex value instead of just a real?

Without getting too Mathematical about it, basically a physical quantity is a "number" with a unit attached to it. "number" means whatever number system you are using, so the unit for a "complex velocity" will still be in m/s, or cm/s, or furlongs/fortnight or whatever your unit system uses. Matrices also work the same way, in case you are wondering. Most people, though, tend to attach the unit to the numbers that make up the matrix rather than apply it to the matrix itself. But there is nothing wrong in doing so.

For the above reasons I can't think of any sort of a "complex" unit. Even if there is a way to define such a thing, I would think that the imaginary nature of the unit would simply be defined as part of the unit itself. For example, you can technically think of a kilogram as being somehow at "right angles" to a meter, and define a kilogram as an "imaginary meter" or [tex]kg=\sqrt{-1}m[/tex]. But the unit would still work the same way as a kilogram would, so I can see no advantage in doing so.

-Dan
 
  • #3
Nothing to be concerned about then. Thanks Dan.
 
  • #4
Orefa said:
I am programming a module used to convert measurement units. This will be part of a system that supports complex numbers. I never use complex numbers in my field but of course engineers and physicists do so I thought I should ask a couple of questions first.

Q1. Is there anything unusual about converting something like (5 + 2i) meters/sec into miles per hour? I think it is the same process as with plain old real numbers (multiply by ~2.237 in this particular case) but are there conditions specific to complex values and not reals?

Q2. Is there any mesurement unit(s) that uses a complex conversion factor instead of just a real ratio? In other words, would the software ever need to indicate a conversion ratio as a complex value instead of just a real?
If you're multiplying by a scalar (which a conversion factor is), just multiply each component by the conversion factor.

As a general rule, you can think of a complex number as a vector. The real component lies on the x-axis and imaginary component lies on the y-axis. That only gives you a two-dimensional vector.

One of the problems in defining three dimensional vectors is that it's hard to define multiplication of two numbers that have a real part and two imaginary parts. The solution is quaternions. They have a real part and three imaginary parts. A true three-dimensional vector has three imaginary parts with the real part set to zero. The real part of the quaternion can come into play if you move into designing three dimensional animations used in modern video games or simulations.
 
  • #5
Just as a piece of random information, I seem to recall reading about a hypothetical particle called the tachyon which has an imaginary rest mass, which has the effect of forcing it to move at superluminal velocities, although never actually accelerating or decelerating past c.
 

Related to Measurement units and complex numbers.

1. What are the basic units of measurement?

The basic units of measurement are length, mass, time, electric current, temperature, amount of substance, and luminous intensity.

2. What is the SI unit for length?

The SI unit for length is meter (m).

3. How are complex numbers represented?

Complex numbers are represented in the form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers and i is the imaginary unit (i = √-1).

4. What is the purpose of using complex numbers?

Complex numbers are used to represent quantities that cannot be measured on a real number line, such as in electrical circuits, signal processing, and quantum mechanics.

5. How are complex numbers added and multiplied?

To add complex numbers, add the real parts and the imaginary parts separately. To multiply complex numbers, use the FOIL method (First, Outer, Inner, Last) and remember that i² = -1.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
583
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
558
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
960
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top