- #1
Dannyinjapan
- 8
- 0
Hi gang
I am new to this forum and I never actually studied this stuff in school. I recently just woke up one morning and had a burning desire to understand the universe. So, I bought all the college textbooks I could get about physics and astrophysics and I have just been reading and reading.
I have a question that I wondered if someone would care to try to explain.
Please keep the answer understandable for me, if you can. (Im only on page 150 of a 400 page book)
Anyway, here goes:
Supposedly, during the big bang, the explosion of matter was homogeneous and isotropic. Have we explained then, how and why "localizations of gravity" could possibly have occurred? If the gravitational constant WAS constant and the exploding, expanding matter was homogeneous and isotropic, then it doesn't seem possible that the stars and planets could have formed...
I am new to this forum and I never actually studied this stuff in school. I recently just woke up one morning and had a burning desire to understand the universe. So, I bought all the college textbooks I could get about physics and astrophysics and I have just been reading and reading.
I have a question that I wondered if someone would care to try to explain.
Please keep the answer understandable for me, if you can. (Im only on page 150 of a 400 page book)
Anyway, here goes:
Supposedly, during the big bang, the explosion of matter was homogeneous and isotropic. Have we explained then, how and why "localizations of gravity" could possibly have occurred? If the gravitational constant WAS constant and the exploding, expanding matter was homogeneous and isotropic, then it doesn't seem possible that the stars and planets could have formed...