Two object run together to the earth despite of their mass

In summary: This is because the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the masses.
  • #1
Hepic
118
0
Everybody knows that two object run together to the Earth despite of their mass. For example we have a object with 30 kg and one with 50 kg and let them from a big height. The reason that they will reach at same time will be that the Earth will put different power about their mass so to catch the asseleration of 10m/s^2. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey! the answer is "no", that's not right this doesn't have anything to do with power. Everything falls with the same acceleration because this acceleration is independant of the mass, some easy calculations can be done to show it.
 
  • #3
Remember that power is work per unit of time, such as joules per second, and is expressed in Watts.
And work is force acting over a distance. W=fd.
So you are correct in that the larger object has "more power", as it can perform more work than a less massive object, but we don't usually put it that way as it isn't really correct. Instead, we say that a greater force is applied to the more massive object. This increase in force is exactly counterbalanced by the increase in mass, thus leading to the acceleration being exactly the same between objects of different masses.
 
  • #4
I think Hepic has got the right idea, only uses non-physical nomenclature.

What he says is that the force(not power) of gravity is proportional to the mass of the falling body, so in the end when we put [itex] F=F_g → ma=\frac{GMm}{R^2}[/itex] the mass m cancels out and we get acceleration independent of it:
[tex]a=\frac{GM}{R^2}[/tex]
 
  • #5
christianpoved said:
Hey! the answer is "no", that's not right this doesn't have anything to do with power. Everything falls with the same acceleration because this acceleration is independant of the mass, some easy calculations can be done to show it.

Bandersnatch said:
I think Hepic has got the right idea, only uses non-physical nomenclature.

What he says is that the force(not power) of gravity is proportional to the mass of the falling body, so in the end when we put [itex] F=F_g → ma=\frac{GMm}{R^2}[/itex] the mass m cancels out and we get acceleration independent of it:
[tex]a=\frac{GM}{R^2}[/tex]
exactly
why to go to that power where we have this
acceleration same then time to cover same distance is same
 
  • #6
Drakkith said:
Remember that power is work per unit of time, such as joules per second, and is expressed in Watts.
And work is force acting over a distance. W=fd.
So you are correct in that the larger object has "more power", as it can perform more work than a less massive object, but we don't usually put it that way as it isn't really correct. Instead, we say that a greater force is applied to the more massive object. This increase in force is exactly counterbalanced by the increase in mass, thus leading to the acceleration being exactly the same between objects of different masses.
Is this allways true for different masses of any size.A weight does not fall at the same rate on the Moon as on Earth.
 
  • #7
A non rigorous way to explain why the 50Kg behaves the same as
a 30 Kg object is the following.
The 50Kg object experiences more FORCE [F = ma = mg],
But it also has more inertia and thus more resistance to a change in its velocity.
The two effects balance to give either object the same acceleration.
 
  • #8
Note that we have an FAQ about this, in the "Frequently Asked Questions" section at the top of this forum. :smile:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511172
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #9
Thank you.you were clear,but I have a question too.How a planet understands that an object has more mass from an other so put more force?
 
  • #10
hi Hepic

so you really didn't quite understand ? :wink:

did you read the link jtbell pointed you to ?

the Earth doesn't know anything ... It doesn't have a mind, to quote a comment from his link ...


What I'm trying to show here is in this scenario, the Earth does not make any significant motion due to the force exerted by m 1 . This means that for this case, it is perfectly fine to consider the Earth as the fixed object, and only consider that it is the smaller mass that falls towards the earth. So when you consider that, then all the simplification that is done to allow us to deduce that the acceleration due to gravity of ALL objects falling on the surface of the Earth to be a constant, independent of the mass of the object.

Note the bolded section

Dave
 
  • #11
What is not quite so clear is the last part of the link.
However, if we change that situation, i.e. if m 1 is now comparable, or even bigger, than M , then those simplifications will no longer be valid, and one will have to start from the very beginning to figure this out.
Small masses have a small effect on the Earth.Once the masses get quite large they do and the Earth no longer remains a fixed object.This only happens when the object is comparable in size to the Earth.The Moon is quite a bit smaller but comparable in size and would have an effect.
How large an object has to be to be comparable is not so clear.
 

1. What is the reason behind two objects of different masses falling at the same rate towards the Earth?

This phenomenon can be explained by the law of universal gravitation, which states that every object in the universe exerts a gravitational force on every other object. The strength of this force is directly proportional to the mass of the objects and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Therefore, even though the two objects have different masses, they experience the same gravitational force from the Earth and thus fall at the same rate.

2. Does the shape of an object affect its rate of falling towards the Earth?

No, the shape of an object does not affect its rate of falling towards the Earth. As long as the objects have the same mass, they will experience the same gravitational force and thus fall at the same rate. However, air resistance may affect the rate of falling for objects with different shapes, but this is a separate factor from the objects' mass.

3. Why do objects with different masses fall at the same rate in a vacuum?

In a vacuum, there is no air resistance, so the only force acting on the objects is the force of gravity. As mentioned earlier, the gravitational force is dependent on the mass of the objects and the distance between them. Since the objects are falling towards the Earth from the same distance, the gravitational force will be the same for both objects regardless of their mass, causing them to fall at the same rate.

4. Is the rate of falling towards the Earth affected by its rotation?

No, the rate of falling towards the Earth is not affected by its rotation. The rotation of the Earth does not change the strength of the gravitational force acting on the objects, as this force is determined by the mass and distance between the objects, not the Earth's rotation.

5. Can two objects with different masses ever fall at different rates towards the Earth?

Yes, if the objects are not experiencing the same gravitational force due to a different distance between them or the presence of other external forces, they may fall at different rates. For example, an object that is closer to the Earth will experience a stronger gravitational force and thus fall faster than an object that is farther away. Additionally, air resistance may also affect the rate of falling for objects with different masses.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
675
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
672
Replies
10
Views
769
Replies
22
Views
21K
Back
Top