- #1
Rants
- 2
- 0
make someone understand the difference between theoretical physics (which is based on evidence) and junk New Age pseudo-physics.
For example, when the theory of gravity is distorted into the "Law of Attraction" behind THE SECRET which says you can get whatever you want just by thinking about it.
Is there a concise, bullet proof argument that can cause an epiphany in the armchair pseudo-physicist? To make them realize "hey, you really do need evidence to accept something as factual."
For example, when the theory of gravity is distorted into the "Law of Attraction" behind THE SECRET which says you can get whatever you want just by thinking about it.
Is there a concise, bullet proof argument that can cause an epiphany in the armchair pseudo-physicist? To make them realize "hey, you really do need evidence to accept something as factual."