- #316
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,256
- 0
© Mr. Robin Parsons Canada 2003
13/06/2003
So Brad_AD23, let's try a simple experiment, logical and consistent.
Draw a circle r = 5, at this point we see acceleration due to gravity as being equal to 5 m per sec2, and, as you have so insistently, and repetitively, told me, all of the vectors cancel to ZERO "NET" force, but there is pressure, as that is the resultant of the "Zero 'Net' force".
So Brad_AD23, as I have put in my profile, I was a mechanic, as there are lots of kinds of mechanics, Auto, Truck, Gas, Diesel, Electrical, Engineering, Robotic, Stationary, Ship, Submarine, Aerospace, Airplane, Small engine, Industrial, Spacecraft, etc. etc. I will not tell you which combinations of those I have been, but I have the experience and the learning to understand (Some/most?) mechanical things.
Now, the pressure that is exerted within that circle, r = 5, is a mechanical pressure, (from, as you two keep repeating, from "All of the weight above") and one of the features of mechanical pressures is that they are even throughout. Across the diameter of that circle the pressure is isotropic and homogenous.
(The same at all points, to the center, and back out)
Now, in that circle, draw me another circle at r = 2, and here we will see the waning of the force of gravity, as both you and Heusdens keep telling me it diminishes all the way down, so here the force of acceleration due to gravity is 2 m per sec2, and all of the vectors cancel out to equate to a pressure exertion. (Zero "net" force, ergo, now a pressuriz(ed)ing force)
Now, I want you to explain to everyone in this forum how the pressure that can be generated by a 2 m per sec2 force, can exceed the pressure that is generated by a 5 m per sec2 force, BECAUSE, very clearly, WE KNOW that the pressure is increasing, as we move towards the center of the Earth, without question.
Please use "consistent, and logical" reasoning to explain your response.
PS If you attempt to tell me, "Well (Mr.) Parsons, it sums", then I am going to have a great laugh, because if it is 'summing', then it must be at 7 m per sec2 that you have dodged the plume problem, well not surprising, NOT AT ALL!
13/06/2003
So Brad_AD23, let's try a simple experiment, logical and consistent.
Draw a circle r = 5, at this point we see acceleration due to gravity as being equal to 5 m per sec2, and, as you have so insistently, and repetitively, told me, all of the vectors cancel to ZERO "NET" force, but there is pressure, as that is the resultant of the "Zero 'Net' force".
So Brad_AD23, as I have put in my profile, I was a mechanic, as there are lots of kinds of mechanics, Auto, Truck, Gas, Diesel, Electrical, Engineering, Robotic, Stationary, Ship, Submarine, Aerospace, Airplane, Small engine, Industrial, Spacecraft, etc. etc. I will not tell you which combinations of those I have been, but I have the experience and the learning to understand (Some/most?) mechanical things.
Now, the pressure that is exerted within that circle, r = 5, is a mechanical pressure, (from, as you two keep repeating, from "All of the weight above") and one of the features of mechanical pressures is that they are even throughout. Across the diameter of that circle the pressure is isotropic and homogenous.
(The same at all points, to the center, and back out)
Now, in that circle, draw me another circle at r = 2, and here we will see the waning of the force of gravity, as both you and Heusdens keep telling me it diminishes all the way down, so here the force of acceleration due to gravity is 2 m per sec2, and all of the vectors cancel out to equate to a pressure exertion. (Zero "net" force, ergo, now a pressuriz(ed)ing force)
Now, I want you to explain to everyone in this forum how the pressure that can be generated by a 2 m per sec2 force, can exceed the pressure that is generated by a 5 m per sec2 force, BECAUSE, very clearly, WE KNOW that the pressure is increasing, as we move towards the center of the Earth, without question.
Please use "consistent, and logical" reasoning to explain your response.
PS If you attempt to tell me, "Well (Mr.) Parsons, it sums", then I am going to have a great laugh, because if it is 'summing', then it must be at 7 m per sec2 that you have dodged the plume problem, well not surprising, NOT AT ALL!