Register to reply 
Question on dualities 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar714, 04:14 PM

P: 119

Hi folks,
I have been trying to get my head around dualities, and hit a stumbling block right away. Duality hypotheses are framed by thinking about perturbative expansions of interaction lagrangians ( at least when thinking about sdualities). In such expansions, the first term is regarded as the 'classical' term, and what that means in the path integral approach is that the first term corresponds to the classical trajectory permitted by the interaction. But then its clear the the perturbative expansion in mind in these discussions of duality cannot be the expansion about the interaction coupling and that Feynman diagrams illustrate, because there the first term is the interactionfree term  not the one describing the classicallypermitted trajectory of the interacting system. So can someone tell me what I'm missing when people like Sen discuss dualities in terms of these expansions ( see eg here http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/dec...articles20.htm) ?! I appreciate this is going to be really obvious, but any help would be much appreciated! 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Please help me compile a list of phenomenal dualities?  General Physics  5  
Holographic Dualities and the Potential Misdirection of String Theory  Beyond the Standard Model  40  
Are dualities not just an expression of equivalence in physical theories?  Beyond the Standard Model  16  
Why string dualities imply unifying Mtheory?  Beyond the Standard Model  14  
Introductory explanation about dualities?  Beyond the Standard Model  7 