- #1
Jason12381
- 2
- 0
Howdy
FYI I'm not a physicist (as you will soon be able to tell from my question, so my apologies :) )
I have a question regarding where the big bang came from
The big bang theory (singularity not phase) is often said to say how everything came from nothing.
Nothing is now said to be more complex than we once realized, where nothing has complex properties etc.
If the point of singularity was to explain how everything came from nothing, would it explain how everything came from the nothing of physics, or the nothing of philosophy (where nothing is a 'true' nothing)
I guess it would be the first! but no one ever clarifies. If it is the first would the physicists nothing be eternal? And outside of the universe?
Or is this complex nothing very much a part of our universe where nothing (as well as everything) was created by the big bang? Therefore suggesting that philosophical nothing was before (or rather not even nothing existed before the big bang)?
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
FYI I'm not a physicist (as you will soon be able to tell from my question, so my apologies :) )
I have a question regarding where the big bang came from
The big bang theory (singularity not phase) is often said to say how everything came from nothing.
Nothing is now said to be more complex than we once realized, where nothing has complex properties etc.
If the point of singularity was to explain how everything came from nothing, would it explain how everything came from the nothing of physics, or the nothing of philosophy (where nothing is a 'true' nothing)
I guess it would be the first! but no one ever clarifies. If it is the first would the physicists nothing be eternal? And outside of the universe?
Or is this complex nothing very much a part of our universe where nothing (as well as everything) was created by the big bang? Therefore suggesting that philosophical nothing was before (or rather not even nothing existed before the big bang)?
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks in advance