- #1
m_p_w
- 23
- 0
I did an experiment where a red laser went through a diffraction grating
The distance between the diffraction grating to the screen is 10cm (x)
Later I measure the distance from the central dot to the first dot (4.5cm) (y)
after this I measure the distance from the central dot to the second dot(13.1cm) (y)
I used this formula to calculate the wavelength of the red laser: d*tan(y/x) = m λ
where m = 0,1,2... and d = 1.67*10^-6 in this experiment.
The problem which I've got is that I got two different wavelengths for the same red laser
692.4nm and 765.6nm.
My question is this, should I add these two wavelengths and then divide it by two to get the "average" wavelength or should I just say in the experiment that the wavelength "765.6nm" is a random error; thus, we should not take it to the consideration?
The distance between the diffraction grating to the screen is 10cm (x)
Later I measure the distance from the central dot to the first dot (4.5cm) (y)
after this I measure the distance from the central dot to the second dot(13.1cm) (y)
I used this formula to calculate the wavelength of the red laser: d*tan(y/x) = m λ
where m = 0,1,2... and d = 1.67*10^-6 in this experiment.
The problem which I've got is that I got two different wavelengths for the same red laser
692.4nm and 765.6nm.
My question is this, should I add these two wavelengths and then divide it by two to get the "average" wavelength or should I just say in the experiment that the wavelength "765.6nm" is a random error; thus, we should not take it to the consideration?