Uncertainty in the standard deviation

In summary, the conversation revolved around finding the mean and standard deviation of a set of radioactive emissions, and then comparing the standard deviation with its expected value. The concept of error propagation was also discussed, and the uncertainty in the standard deviation was found to be 0.5. However, it was argued that this value may not accurately represent the uncertainty in all cases.
  • #1
Shukie
95
0

Homework Statement


A health physicist is testing a new detector and places it near a weak radioactive sample. In five separate 10-second intervals, the detector counts the following numbers of radioactive emissions:

16, 21, 13, 12, 15.

a) Find the mean and standard deviation (SD) of these five numbers.

b) Compare the standard deviation with its expected value, the square root of the average number.

c) Naturally, the two numbers in part b) do not agree exactly, and we would like to have some way to assess their disagreement. This problem is, in fact, one of error propagation. We have measured the number v. The expected standard deviation in this number is just [tex]\sqrt{v}[/tex], a simple function of v. Thus, the uncertainty in the standard deviation can be found by error propagation. Show, in this way, that the uncertainty in the SD is 0.5. Do the numbers in part b) agree within this uncertainty?

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Mean = 15.4
Standard deviation = 3.5

b) Expected SD = [tex]\sqrt{15.4} = 3.9[/tex]

c) I know that the following is true: [tex]{\sigma}(\sqrt{v})= {\sigma}_v*\frac{d(\sqrt{v})}{dv} = 0.5[/tex] where [tex]{\sigma}_v = \sqrt{v}[/tex]. How do I show by error propagation that the uncertainty in the SD is 0.5?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't see why this should be 1/2, neither from a scaling argument, nor from a simulation, nor from calculation.

* If we replace the 5 data points by a million then certainly our sample variance will be extremely close to the expected variance, and our uncertainty won't be 1/2. The question doesn't use the N=5 information.
* If we replace the 5 data points by 5 data points with an average of millions then clearly the sample variance will have a much larger variance. The 1/2 doesn't reflect that either.

I produced hundreds of sets of 5 numbers with a mean of 15.4 and a standard deviation of sqrt(15.4). I used a normal distribution because I didn't find a nice way to get Poisson-distributed numbers but that shouldn't matter. The standard deviations had a standard deviation of about 1.3, clearly not 1/2.The standard deviation is $$\sigma_{obs} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N}\sum_i x_i^2 - \frac{1}{N^2}\left(\sum_i x_i\right)^2}$$
Looking at the first data point only:
$$\frac{d\sigma_{obs}}{dx_1} = \frac{1}{2 \sigma_{obs}} \left( \frac{1}{N} 2 x_1 - \frac{2}{N^2} \sum_i x_i\right) = \frac{1}{N \sigma_{obs}} ( x_i - \bar{x})$$
This intuitively makes sense: If a datapoint is below the average then raising it reduces the standard deviation, otherwise it increases it.
It's uncertainty is its own square root, so ##x_1##'s contribution to the overall uncertainty is ##\displaystyle \frac{1}{N \sigma_{obs}} | x_1 - \bar{x}| \sqrt{x_1}##. Adding the contributions in quadrature we get
$$(\Delta \sigma_{obs})^2 = \frac{1}{N^2 \sigma_{obs}^2} \sum_i (x_i-\bar{x})^2x_i$$

Not sure how to calculate the expectation value of that now. It seems to have the right scaling, it's larger for larger numbers and smaller for larger N.
 
  • #3
Shukie said:
We have measured the number v.
Umm.. what is v?
Shukie said:
the uncertainty in the SD
I assume this means the uncertainty in the expected SD of the counts given only their mean.
 

1. What is the standard deviation?

The standard deviation is a measure of how spread out a set of data is from its mean. It indicates the average amount of deviation or variation from the mean.

2. How is standard deviation calculated?

To calculate the standard deviation, you first find the mean of the data set. Then, for each data point, subtract the mean and square the result. Next, find the average of these squared differences. Finally, take the square root of this average to get the standard deviation.

3. What is the significance of uncertainty in the standard deviation?

Uncertainty in the standard deviation indicates the level of accuracy and reliability of the calculated value. It measures the degree of uncertainty in the estimate of the standard deviation, which can affect the interpretation of the data.

4. How does sample size affect uncertainty in the standard deviation?

A larger sample size typically results in a more precise estimate of the standard deviation, leading to lower uncertainty. This is because a larger sample size provides more data points, reducing the impact of outliers and making the data more representative of the population.

5. How can uncertainty in the standard deviation be reduced?

Uncertainty in the standard deviation can be reduced by increasing the sample size, using more precise measurement techniques, and eliminating outliers. It can also be reduced by performing multiple trials and taking the average of the standard deviations.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
913
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
791
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
580
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top