
#1
Feb2406, 12:43 PM


#2
Feb2406, 03:03 PM

P: 335

To attack this what you want to do is consider a small portion of the circle of arc length ds. (Recall that [tex]s=r \theta[/tex] so you can convert this to a [tex]d \theta[/tex].) ds has a charge of [tex]dq=\lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta[/tex]. How do you find the electric field element dE from knowing dq and its location? How then would you find the total E? (Don't forget that E is a vector!) Dan 



#3
Feb2406, 03:18 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,540

Your thinking is right, but you can actually show your answer mathematically by integrating Coulomb's law over the ring. You start with the differential version of Coulomb's law. I would actually use the electric potential so that I wouldn't have to worry about the different directions of the vectors between points on the ring and the center.
[tex]dV=\frac{kdq}{R}[/tex] Note that [itex]dq=\lambda ds[/itex] and go from there. Once you have the potential you can find the field from [itex]\vec{E}=\vec{\nabla}V[/itex]. 



#4
Feb2506, 06:20 AM

P: 189

Fun problem in calculating the electric field in the center of a charged ringSo I did what you told me to: took a small portion of arc length [tex]ds_1[/tex] on the upper semicircle and because [tex]s_1=r \theta[/tex] this leads to [tex]ds_1 = r d \theta[/tex]. Therefore: [tex]dq_1=\lambda ds_1= r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta[/tex]. ([tex]\theta[/tex] is positive because it's the upper semicircle, therefore the sine is positive too and the charge as well). I also took a small portion of arc length [tex]ds_2[/tex] facing [tex]ds_1[/tex] which has a charge of [tex]dq_2=\lambda ds_2=  r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta[/tex] ([tex]\theta[/tex] is negative because it's the lower semicircle, therefore the sine is also negative and the charge as well). Next I split the problem of finding E in four parts: first I'll find [tex]d E_x_1[/tex] for [tex]dq_1[/tex] on the upper semicircle and integrate over the whole semi circle in order to find the total [tex]E_x_1[/tex] caused by the upper part.(1) Then I'll find [tex]d E_x_2[/tex] for [tex]dq_2[/tex] on the lower semicircle and integrate over the whole semi circle in order to find the total [tex]E_x_2[/tex] caused by the upper part. Then I'll add them in order to find the total [tex]E_x[/tex] in the center of the circle. (2) I'll do the same for [tex]d E_y_1[/tex] (3) and [tex]d E_y_2[/tex] (4) in order to get to [tex]E_y_1[/tex] and [tex]E_y_2[/tex] providing [tex]E_y[/tex] when added. (1) [tex]dE_x_1 = \frac{k dq_1}{r^2} cos \theta = \frac{k r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta}{r^2} cos \theta =\frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta [/tex] [tex] E_x_1= \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \left[ \frac{1}{2}(sin\theta)^2 \right]_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2}= \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} (\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2})=0 [/tex] (2) [tex]dE_x_2 = \frac{k dq_2}{r^2} cos (\theta) = \frac{k r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta}{r^2} cos \theta =\frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta [/tex] [tex] E_x_2= \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} sin \theta cos \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \left[ \frac{1}{2}(sin\theta)^2 \right]_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2}= \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} (\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2})=0 [/tex] Therefore [tex]E_x_1 + E_x_2 = 0+0 = 0[/tex] so there is no x component of E in the center of the ring. (3) [tex]dE_y_1 = \frac{k dq_1}{r^2} sin \theta = \frac{k r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta}{r^2} sin \theta =\frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin^2 \theta d\theta [/tex] [tex] E_y_1= \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin^2 \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} sin^2 \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \theta  \frac{1}{4}(sin 2 \theta) \right]_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2}= \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} (\frac{1}{4} +\frac{1}{4})= \frac{k \lambda_0 \pi}{2r} [/tex] (4) [tex]dE_y_2 = \frac{k dq_2}{r^2} sin \theta =  \frac{k dq_2}{r^2} sin \theta =  \frac{ k r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta}{r^2} sin \theta = \frac{k r \lambda_0 sin \theta d \theta}{r^2} sin \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin^2 \theta d\theta [/tex] [tex] E_y_2= \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} sin^2 \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \int_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2} sin^2 \theta d \theta = \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} \left[ \frac{1}{2} \theta  \frac{1}{4}(sin 2 \theta) \right]_{\pi/2}^{\pi/2}= \frac{k \lambda_0}{r} (\frac{1}{4} +\frac{1}{4})= \frac{k \lambda_0 \pi}{2r} [/tex] Therefore [tex]E_y_1 + E_y_2 = \frac{k \lambda_0 \pi}{2r} + \frac{k \lambda_0 \pi}{2r} = \frac{k \lambda_0 \pi}{r} [/tex] which is the total [tex]E_y[/tex] component of E. To shorten all of this: E has only a ycomponent (as expected) in the center of the ring... but is the formula I found the correct one? 



#5
Feb2506, 07:09 AM

P: 335

It looks very good. To be honest I wouldn't have calculated the x components because we can make a symmetry argument to cancel them (I'm lazy! ), but it never hurts to work it out. The only thing I would add is to remind you to make E a vector in your final answer. (Professors LOVE taking points off for that kind of thing!) Dan 



#6
Feb2506, 07:21 AM

P: 189

Whoops hehe I missed the pi while puzzeling in LaTeX ;), but it I did write it down properly on my paper :D. As for E being a vector, thanks for reminding me :D I'll be sure to add a j and little arrows here and there ;)
Thanks for your help!!! 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Electric field in an offcenter hole of an uniformly charged sphere  Advanced Physics Homework  12  
Charged ring and electric field problem  Introductory Physics Homework  0  
Calculating the Electric Potential from an Electric Field problem  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
electric field due to a charged ring offaxis  Classical Physics  1  
Electrostatics Problem (Calculating Electric Field)  Advanced Physics Homework  3 