Dark matter properties detected using VLT

AI Thread Summary
A recent study utilizing the VLT array has successfully measured the temperature and size of dark matter clumps, revealing that dark matter particles are moving at an average speed of 9 kilometers per second. The research indicates that no dark matter clouds smaller than approximately 30 million solar masses or 1,000 light-years in diameter were detected, suggesting that smaller clouds disperse due to random motion. The study, led by Gerry Gilmore's team, is anticipated to be a significant contribution to the field and is expected to be submitted to Arxiv soon. Discussions have referenced a related BBC article titled "Dark matter comes out of the cold," which highlights these findings. The paper is expected to be one of the most important publications of 2006.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
A recent study using the VLT array has measured the temperature and size of dark matter clumps. Interestingly enough, the study has not yet been submitted to Arxiv, but will probably appear within a week. It is expected to be one of the most important papers in 2006. Here is a teaser:

Dark matter comes out of the cold
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4679220.stm
 
Space news on Phys.org
Chronos said:
A recent study using the VLT array has measured the temperature and size of dark matter clumps. Interestingly enough, the study has not yet been submitted to Arxiv, but will probably appear within a week. It is expected to be one of the most important papers in 2006. Here is a teaser:

Dark matter comes out of the cold
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4679220.stm

We talked about that BBC article "Dark matter comes out of the cold" in another PF thread started 2 or 3 weeks ago
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109870

About Arxiv, I think the study may already have been submitted to Arxiv actually.
Gilmore is one of the authors

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602186

this was posted on Arxiv around 8 February which was about the same time that the "out of the cold" BBC article quoting Gilmore was posted.

I have a vague memory of discussing this with Spacetiger, a couple of weeks ago, and maybe you also were in that thread. It was about the BBC article you mention.

The thing was they inferred that the DM particles were going around 9 kilometers per second, because they didnt find clouds smaller than a certain size, and the size of the clouds was inferred from the clumps of VISIBLE matter-----the dwarf galaxies

dont completely remember, may be mistaken
 
Last edited:
Some interesting points came up in that earlier discussion of the BBC article you mentioned

You may recall it now. This is how it started----topic was 'temperature of DM'
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109870

marcus said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4679220.stm

Gerry Gilmore's Cambridge team did a survey of clouds of dark matter, using several telescopes including VLT in Chile. they found no blobs of DM smaller than about 30 million solar masses, or less than 1000 lightyear diameter.

They inferred from this a characteristic TEMPERATURE of dark matter. the particles must be moving on average 9 kilometer per second, so that clouds that are not big enough DISPERSE by random motion.

The clouds that are not big enough don't have enough gravity to hold themselves together, given the particles' speed of random motion.

Spacetiger had some things to say, I think you also commented, and several other people
 
Last edited:
Oops. I need to replace my memory chips.
 
Chronos said:
Oops. I need to replace my memory chips.

when you find a supplier, let me know----I could use some too:smile:
 
I'm too excited to sleep until I see the paper . . . zzzzzz.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top