Register to reply

Do individuals most often convert science?

by Loren Booda
Tags: convert, individuals, science
Share this thread:
Loren Booda
Jan24-04, 05:50 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Is one person, as distinct from scientific communities, more likely to establish an revolutionary application of the scientific method; i. e., have individuals themselves shifted an existing paradigm more often and profoundly than groups of scientists?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Jan24-04, 08:31 PM
PF Gold
P: 8,147
Very often the answer to that question is not one, but two.

Newton had to deal with competitors: Hooke had the idea for the inverse square law, and Leibniz developed Calculus independently.

Similarly Einstein was ghosted by Poincare on special relativity and by Hilbert on general relativity.

Quantum mechanics was invented independently by Heisenberg and Schroedinger. QED was invented FOUR times: by Schwinger, Tomonaga, Feynmann, and Stueckelberg! Three men got the Nobel for the electroweak theory.

Then you get into influences. Maxwell couldn't (it seems) have developed his theory without the prior work of Faraday. But everyone including Faraday agreed that he could never have done it.

Since about 1930, the rapid growth of science and mathematics have made it harder for a single individual to turn a whole field around.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is nature a reflection of who we are as individuals? General Discussion 1
Social Construction of Gender & Intersexed Individuals Social Sciences 118
Why are we individuals? General Discussion 75