What Is Energy Really?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kishtik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical definition of energy, particularly in relation to kinetic energy (KE) and work done. It highlights the equation linking kinetic energy differences to work, emphasizing that energy is often defined through mathematical formulations rather than a tangible concept. The conversation references Feynman's perspective that energy lacks a concrete physical representation, existing instead as an abstract quantity calculated through formulas. Additionally, it touches on the developmental understanding of energy from childhood experiences, suggesting a foundational grasp of dynamics. Ultimately, the nature of energy remains a complex topic, blending mathematical definitions with philosophical inquiries.
kishtik
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
<br /> v_f^2-v_0^2=2ax<br />
Multiplying by m,
<br /> \frac{mv_f^2-mv_i^2}{2}=max<br />
<br /> \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2=Fx<br />
This equation is true for all of the motions which include a force. Therefore we call the left side KE difference, and the right side work done.
Is energy a thing which can only be defined mathematically? Or are there any other ways to define it? If yes, why did Euler call it vis viva? Was it only because of KE? If no, what leads us to conclude that there is a thing called energy?
For almost every physical definition, we have an imagination, a perception, a conception, something inexplicable. Where is this coming from? When we were babies, playing with Legos (K'Nex for me) we learn about dynamics and perhaps energy. I've read that smells, tastes and views were perceived the same by a little baby. Perhaps we develop that conciousness at that age.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This only works if a, m, and F are constant, in general. Otherwise, you have to integrate.
 


Originally posted by kishtik

Is energy a thing which can only be defined mathematically?
For the most part that is true. Recall what Feynman said on this point
It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is not that way. However, there are formulas for calculating some numerical quantity, and we add it all together it gives “28” - always the same number. It is an abstract thing in that it does not tell us the mechanism or the reasons for the various formulas.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top