Proof by induction of a problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcin w
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical assertion by induction, specifically the equality involving summations of fractions. The user defines a summation notation and then presents their induction proof, starting with a base case that they claim is true. They outline their approach to prove the assertion for k+1, detailing the steps taken to manipulate the summation expressions. Feedback is requested on whether the definitions from part 1 should have been utilized in part 2, and additional insights are provided regarding the handling of terms in the induction step. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and correctness in mathematical proofs.
marcin w
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here. Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marcin w said:
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here.
Your teacher might not appreciate that! Saying something is true is not proving that it is true.

Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
In going form n to n+1, two things happen. First, since the sum starts at n+1 in the first case and (n+1)-1 in the second, you are missing the first term. Second, since the sum ends at 2n in the first case and 2(n+1)= 2n+ 2 in the second, you will have two new terms, 2n+1 and 2n+ 2. That is,
\sum_{k= (n+1)+1}^{2(n+1)} \frac{1}{k}= \sum_{k= n+1}^{2n} \frac{1}{k}+ \frac{1}{2n+1}+ \frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}
Now, replace that sum by
\sum_{m=1}^{2n} \frac{(-1)^m+1}{m}
and do the algebra.

You might want to use the fact that
\frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}= \frac{1- 2}{2n+2}= -\frac{1}{2n+2}
 
Thanks, your answer was helpful and much appreciated.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top