Tension on a Rope with Variable Mass Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Solidmozza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rope Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a vertical rope with a block attached, under the influence of a constant upward force. The problem involves applying Newton's Second Law to both the entire system and a specific point on the rope. The solution derives the tension at a distance 'x' from the top of the rope, leading to the formula T = F[M + m(1 - x/L)]/(M + m). Key points include understanding the forces acting on the system and how to express the mass of the rope segment at point 'x'. The clarification of the approach helps in grasping the underlying physics of the problem.
Solidmozza
Messages
29
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A block with mass 'M' is attached to the lower end of a vertical, uniform rope with mass 'm' and length 'L'. A constant upward force 'F' is applied to the top of the rope, causing the rope and block to accelerate upward. Find the tension in the rope at a dstance 'x' from the top end of the rope, where 'x' can have any value from 0 to 'L'.


Homework Equations


Newton's Second and Third Laws.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm a bit confused on this question. I've tried breaking the problem up into three parts - one for the block mass 'M', one for the top of the rope and one for a point 'x' on the rope - but I can't seem to get it to work. The actual constant force there is annoying too - for the top of the rope I have a force acting downwards of (m+M)g, and an upwards force that is greater than that of 'F', but I don't know how I can equate etc. The answer is F[M+m(1-x/L)]/(M+m) but I want to know why.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to apply Newton's 2nd law to the whole system in order to find the acceleration. Then try to look at an element of the rope at a distance x from the top end of the rope, and try to express the mass of that element somehow. Then apply Newton's 2nd law again. I don't have the time to write it down and check if it's right, though.
 
Ah sweet! That seems so obvious now - Silly me!
~~~~~
First, we consider the point on the highest point of the rope (ie where x=0). There are only 2 forces acting here: the combined weight force of the rope and the block, and the upward force. Since the whole thing is accelerating, we use Newtons second equation of motion... F=ma, now m = M+m (mass of rope+block), so we get a = F/(M+m). Now we take the point 'x' on the rope. Am I right in saying that there are only two forces here - the tension force due to action-reaction pairs which acts upwards, and the weight force? (It seems to work mathematically...). So we know that the mass of the section of the rope + block =.. M+M[(L-x)/L]. Thus again we use F=ma (although its tension force this time!), giving F= M+M[(L-x)/L] x F/(M+m), which is= F[M+m(1-x/L)]/(M+m) as required.

Thanks for your help :D
 
  • Like
Likes Touuka
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top