Understanding the idea of coherence

  • Thread starter Thread starter acme37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherence Idea
acme37
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble understanding the idea of coherence.

Consider the phrase: "a coherent superposition of states."

Here I understand the coherence to refer to the states being coupled to each other and capable of interfering, due to a perturbing field.

How does this relate to coherent light, which I understand to be light that is monochromatic and phase-correlated? What happens if you shine light that is monochromatic, but not coherent, on the atomic system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I basically get it.

"In general, we say that atomic coherence exists when the density matrix has off-diagonal elements" - Quantum Optics, Scully & Zubairy

A coherence exists when an interference can occur
 
In case anybody is interested, here is why I was asking...

For our QM final we had to pick a topic and do a writeup/presentation. I was intrigued by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency" and ended up writing generally about interference in three-level atomic systems. I've attached my writeup - I actually haven't turned it in yet, so if you have any comments, please do share.

Only lame thing is I use a probability amplitude treatment and couldn't get nice closed forms for the absorption and refractive index curves near resonance, which are the useful result here. I could have done the density matrix, but probably not in the 15 minutes I have to present. Solving for the susceptibility gets a little ugly

cheers,
Kevin
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top