Question about some terminology

  • Thread starter Thread starter navigator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terminology
AI Thread Summary
Identification topology is termed "quotient topology" due to its analogy with quotient groups, where a set is partitioned into equivalence classes. The discussion highlights a viewpoint that identification resembles a gluing operation, akin to subtraction, rather than division. The relationship between quotient topology and product topology is questioned, with a request for clarification on their connection. Additionally, there is curiosity about the origins of mathematical terminology such as "ring," "ideal," and "soul." Overall, the conversation seeks to deepen understanding of these mathematical concepts and their nomenclature.
navigator
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Why the mathematician call identification topology "quotient topology"?from my viewpoint,identification topology bear an analogy with difference(minus),not quotient(divide)...BTW,Could anybody tell me the reason why the mathematicians who coined the term "ring","ideal","soul" called them like that,is there any anecdote about this terminology...tell me sth about them...Thx...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
up

Does anyone know about it?
 
I'm afraid I don't see what your problem is with "quotient". It is, of course, in analogy to "quotient groups". If the groups happened to be written in "additive notation", i.e. a+ b rather than ab, identity= 0 rather than 1, the quotient group might correspond to a "subtrahend group" but that it just cosmetic.

As for the other terms, yo might find this websit interesting:
http://members.aol.com/jeff570/mathword.html
 
Thanks for your reply.Well,what I doubt will be stated in the following.From the viewpoint of intuition,identification is a gluing operation.As an example,we could get cylinder from rectangle via identification IxI/~(where (0,y)~(1,y)),and we may see that the operation is like to subtract the edge ((0,y) or (1,y)) from the rectangle,so identification should have an analogy with subtraction,rather than division.and when we call it quotient topology,what is the relation between quotient topology and product topology?inversion or other?...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top