Analyzing Projectile Motion Data: How Do I Create Relevant Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student struggling with the "making sense of data" coursework for the AS advancing physics course, specifically analyzing projectile motion data. The student has initial velocity, horizontal distance, and height data but is unsure how to create the required graphs. Respondents suggest plotting time versus height or horizontal versus vertical distance and inquire about the specific data points provided. They emphasize the need to apply equations for parabolic motion if only initial parameters are given. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding projectile motion to complete the coursework successfully.
Fage
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to do the "making sense of data" coursework for the AS advancing physics course. The problem is in for this thursday and I can;t do it. We have been given data about an experiment which invovles a projectile leaving a tube. We know the initial velocity of the projectile, the horizontal distance it has traveled and the height it leaves the tube. We are supposed to analyse this data and produce graphs but I don't know how?? I think it has something to do with parabola. If anyone could help asap with a coursework I could look at or some advice it would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see, what kind of graphs do you need to produce? Do you know the equations that describe the projectile's motion?
 
You are probably asked to plot time versus height or horizontal versus vertical distance. You say you were given data. Do you know what they are? how many data points were you given?

If, instead of a table or a list of numbers, you were given just initial parameters, you will probably need to plug them into the equations for parabolic throw.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top