Most General Canonical Transformation?

AI Thread Summary
Canonical transformations (CTs) in classical Hamiltonian mechanics are known to preserve the structure of Hamilton's equations, with textbooks typically distinguishing between "restricted" CTs that mix generalized coordinates and momenta, and "extended" CTs that also involve time. The discussion raises the possibility of transformations that exclusively mix the Hamiltonian (H) and time (t) while maintaining the form of Hamilton's equations, suggesting a broader category of CTs. The inquiry seeks to define the most general CTs and the group they form. Understanding these transformations could deepen insights into the symplectic structure of Poisson manifolds. The exploration of this topic may reveal new avenues in the study of Hamiltonian systems.
strangerep
Science Advisor
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
2,213
In classical Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of a canonical transformation ("CT")
preserving the form of Hamilton's eqns is well known. Textbooks (e.g., Goldstein)
distinguish "restricted" CTs that just mix the q's and p's (generalized coordinates and
generalized momenta respectively). These form the usual group of symplectomorphisms
on Poisson manifolds discussed in the more high-brow books.
Textbooks also mention "extended" CTs that involve the time parameter.

But I can also imagine transformations that only mix H and t, but still preserve the
form of Hamilton's eqns (assuming the various functions and derivatives are
sufficiently well-behaved).

So... what are the most general CTs, and what group is formed from them?

TIA.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top