Can Physics Principles Prove Innocence in Court?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lawyer Physicist
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the analysis of a shooting incident, where a bullet's impact on a wooden chair is examined to potentially prove a client's innocence in a murder case. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically forces, motion, and friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculations related to the force exerted by the bullet on the chair and the subsequent motion of the chair. Questions arise regarding the relevance of the gun's barrel length and the chair's movement across the floor. Some participants express concerns about the complexity of the calculations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants questioning the necessity of certain information and the overall approach taken in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's method, but some guidance has been suggested regarding the role of friction and the chair's movement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the type of floor and chair in relation to the problem, indicating that these factors may influence the outcome of the analysis. There is also mention of the need for additional information to fully understand the dynamics at play.

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are a world-famous physicist-lawyer defending a client who has been charged with murder. It is alleged that your client, Mr. Smith, shot the victim, Mr. Wesson. The detective who investigated the scene of the crime found a second bullet, from a shot that missed Mr. Wesson, that had embedded itself into a chair. You arise to cross-examine the detective. You: In what type of chair did you find the bullet? Det: A wooden chair. You: How massive was this chair? Det: It had a mass of 20.0 kg. You: How did the chair respond to being struck with a bullet? Det: It slid across the floor. You: How far? Det: Three centimeters. The slide marks on the dusty floor are quite distinct. You: What kind of floor was it? Det: A wood floor, very nice oak planks. You: What was the mass of the bullet you retrieved from the chair? Det: Its mass was 10 g. You: And how far had it penetrated into the chair? Det: A distance of 4.00 cm. You: Have you tested the gun you found in Mr. Smith's possession? Det: I have. You: What is the muzzle velocity of bullets fired from that gun? Det: The muzzle velocity is 450 m/s. You: And the barrel length? Det: The gun has a barrel length of 62 cm.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




I found the force on chair by the bullet if the bullet is going 450 m/s

0=(450)^2 +2a(.04m)
a= -2531250 m/s^2

F= (.01kg)(-2531250m/s^2)
So force by bullet on chair is 25312.5 N
This force acts this time:
for 0=(450m/s) + (-2531250m/s^2)(t)
t= 1.78 * 10^-4 s

Force of friction on chair : (20.01kg)(9.80)(.20) = 39.2 N

sum forces on x = Fb-kinetic friction = 25312.5N-39.2N= 25273.3 N
acceleration of chair= (20.01kg)(a)= 25273.3N a=1263 m/s^2

Impulse-momentum theorem: Impulse plus initial momentum equals final momentum
(25273.3N)(1.78*10^-4s) + 0 = (20.01kg)v
v=.225m/s this is the velocity of the chair when the bullet stops moving

distance it has gone during the impulse:
(.225m/s)^2= (0m/s)^2 + 2(1263 m/s^2)x
x=2.00*10^-5 m

after this: Force of friction = 39.2 N

(20.01kg)(a)=(-39.2N) a=-1.95 m/s^2

distance traveled during this time

(0m/s)^2=(.225 m/s)^2 + 2(-1.95m/s^2)x
x=.013 m =1.29 cm.

Is this correct, or am I making this way too complicated? If it is not correct, could you please explain how you would have done it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why does the problem give you the barrel length of the gun?
 
I think that is useless info. Any thoughts on this one yet?
 
Why does the chair not move across the entire room?

You need another piece of information: hint: it has to do with the fact that the floor is wood, as well as the chair feet?

AM
 
i took friction into account i think
 
I think you are making this too complicated
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K