Register to reply

Finding an orthonormal basis

by DWill
Tags: basis, orthonormal
Share this thread:
DWill
#1
Nov13-08, 09:41 PM
P: 70
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Find an orthonormal basis for the subspace of R^3 consisting of all vectors (a, b, c) such that a + b + c = 0.


2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
I know how to find an orthonormal basis just for R^3 by taking the standard basis vectors (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1) and applying the Gram-Schmidt process to make them orthonormal. The condition that a + b + c must equal 0 is throwing me off, however. Can anyone give me any suggestions for how to approach problems like these? thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
'Smart material' chin strap harvests energy from chewing
King Richard III died painfully on battlefield
Capturing ancient Maya sites from both a rat's and a 'bat's eye view'
Dick
#2
Nov13-08, 10:02 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235
If you know Gram-Schmidt, that's the hard part. What's so hard about about finding two vectors (a,b,c) such that a+b+c=0 to do Gram-Schmidt with? (1,-1,0) sounds like a good start. Give me another one.
DWill
#3
Nov13-08, 10:07 PM
P: 70
I think I need 3 vectors, right? such that a + b + c = 0. Can I start with any vector? Or is there a reason why (1, -1, 0) is a good choice? If it can be any 3 vectors that add to 0 it should be simpler, but then I can't be sure they are a basis?

Dick
#4
Nov13-08, 10:10 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235
Finding an orthonormal basis

Why do you need 3 vectors? That's a subspace of R^3. It looks to me like it's two dimensional.
DWill
#5
Nov13-08, 10:16 PM
P: 70
Ohh.. sorry I was being confused, I thought a, b, and c referred to vectors and not the components.

So I can choose (1, -1, 0) like you said and also (1, 0, -1)? I would still have to check if the 2 vectors I choose are actually a basis (span R^3 and are linearly independent) right?
Dick
#6
Nov13-08, 10:18 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235
Sure, exactly. That's a good choice. There aren't too many dumb choices. (1,-1,0) and (-1,1,0) would have been a dumb choice because they're linearly dependent. But you didn't make the dumb choice. Now do Gram-Schmidt.
Mark44
#7
Nov13-08, 11:57 PM
Mentor
P: 21,397
I know how to find an orthonormal basis just for R^3 by taking the standard basis vectors (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1) and applying the Gram-Schmidt process to make them orthonormal.
If you apply Gram-Schmidt to these vectors, you'll just get the same ones. They are already orthogonal and have length 1.
Mark44
#8
Nov14-08, 12:13 AM
Mentor
P: 21,397
Quote Quote by DWill View Post
Ohh.. sorry I was being confused, I thought a, b, and c referred to vectors and not the components.

So I can choose (1, -1, 0) like you said and also (1, 0, -1)? I would still have to check if the 2 vectors I choose are actually a basis (span R^3 and are linearly independent) right?
I'm not sure it's clear to you where Dick got the vectors he did. Start with your equation:
a + b + c = 0

If you solve for a, you get
a = -b - c, where b and c are arbitrary
b =  b
c =      c
That last two equations are obviously true.
To make things even more explicit,
a = -1b - 1c
b =  1b + 0c
c =  0b  +1 c
or,
[tex]
\left[
\begin{array}{ c }
a \\
b \\
c
\end{array} \right] = b\left[
\begin{array}{ c }
-1 \\
1 \\
0
\end{array} \right] + c\left[
\begin{array}{ c }
-1 \\
0 \\
1
\end{array} \right][/tex]
Voila, there's your basis.
HallsofIvy
#9
Nov14-08, 04:17 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,682
Quote Quote by DWill View Post
Ohh.. sorry I was being confused, I thought a, b, and c referred to vectors and not the components.

So I can choose (1, -1, 0) like you said and also (1, 0, -1)? I would still have to check if the 2 vectors I choose are actually a basis (span R^3 and are linearly independent) right?
You need to review basic definitions. Those two vectors CAN'T be a basis for R^3 and can't span R^3 because that requires THREE vectors. You must have misread the original problem. As Dick said, the set of all (a, b, c) such that a+ b+ c= 0 is a two dimensional subspace of R^3. NO set of such vectors can be a basis for R^3. (1, -1, 0) and (1, 0, -1) form a basis for that two dimensional subspace.
jinksys
#10
Jul27-10, 12:09 AM
jinksys's Avatar
P: 123
I'm currently doing the same problem so I figured I'd revive this old thread.

Once I have my two vectors,
u1=<-1,1,0> and u2=<-1,0,1>

I then go through the Gram-Schmidt process to find the normalized basis?
Mark44
#11
Jul27-10, 01:08 AM
Mentor
P: 21,397
If you already have a basis, you don't need Gram-Schmidt to find a normalized basis.

Do you know what the term "normalized" means?
jinksys
#12
Jul27-10, 01:15 AM
jinksys's Avatar
P: 123
Quote Quote by Mark44 View Post
If you already have a basis, you don't need Gram-Schmidt to find a normalized basis.

Do you know what the term "normalized" means?
Sorry, I meant a orthonormal basis.
Mark44
#13
Jul27-10, 02:15 PM
Mentor
P: 21,397
OK, in that case you need to use G-S.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
A question about orthgonal/orthonormal basis Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Orthonormal Basis Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Orthonormal basis and operators Quantum Physics 15
Orthonormal Basis of a Plane Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Help with making an orthonormal basis Linear & Abstract Algebra 4