Using a Geiger–Müller tube to prove inverse square law

AI Thread Summary
The experiment using a Geiger–Müller tube aimed to demonstrate Newton's Inverse Square Law in the context of radioactivity by measuring clicks from Strontium-90 at halved distances. The results indicated that the number of clicks appeared to double as the distance was halved, contradicting the expected inverse square relationship. Participants were encouraged to consider the constant of proportionality and how it might affect the results. A suggestion was made to plot the data on a logarithmic scale to better analyze the relationship. This approach could clarify whether the observed pattern aligns with a power law.
beatlemaniac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Today our class used a Geiger–Müller tube for the first time, and we conducted a short experiment to prove that Newton's Inverse Square Law also applies to radioactivity. We recorded the number of clicks from a small sample of Strontium-90 for ten seconds at halved distances, as shown below...


Distance from sample (m) = 0.24
No. of clicks = 5, 6, 7, 3, 2
Average = 4.6

Distance from sample (m) = 0.12
No. of clicks = 5, 13, 5, 4, 6
Average = 6.6

Distance from sample (m) = 0.06
No. of clicks = 18, 21, 21, 27, 28
Average = 23

Distance from sample (m) = 0.03
No. of clicks = 42, 30, 45, 50, 44
Average = 42.2

Distance from sample (m) = 0.015
No. of clicks = 114, 97, 82, 96, 94
Average = 96.6


As you can see the number of clicks seems to be doubling as the distance is halved, not squaring as we expected. Any ideas on we were doing wrong?

Homework Equations



\textit{Bq}\propto\frac{1}{d^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



?

This is my first post on the site so I hope I have adhered to all your conventions and what not :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beatlemaniac said:
As you can see the number of clicks seems to be doubling as the distance is halved, not squaring as we expected. Any ideas on we were doing wrong?

That may be due to the constant of proportionality. Can you think of a sure way to test if a given set of points follow a power law?

Hint: It involves plotting them in a special kind of chart with special scales on the axes ;)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top