| Thread Closed |
Mersenne prime |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct22-09, 07:00 AM | #1 |
|
|
Mersenne prime
I was trying to prove the statement "If (2^n)-1 is prime then n is prime". I've already seen the proof using factorisation of the difference of integers and getting a contradiction, but I was trying to use groups instead. I was wondering if it's possible, since I keep getting stuck.
So far I've got: If (2^n)-1=p where p is prime then [tex]2^{n}\equiv1 mod(p)[/tex]. The group {1,2,...,p-1} is cyclic and every element has order p-1. So n = k(p-1) for some positive integer k. But doesn't this mean n is not prime? which is wrong I know. Could someone point me in the right direction or a theorem that might be useful? |
| Oct23-09, 11:56 PM | #2 |
|
|
Interesting problem... I'm not yet sure of a proof, but your statement
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Mersenne prime
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Order of 3 modulo a Mersenne prime | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 4 | ||
| TWO new Mersenne primes? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 3 | ||
| New Mersenne numbers conjecture | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 4 | ||
| M43: GIMPS project has found a new Mersenne prime | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 15 | ||
| The GIMPS project has found a new Mersenne prime number: M42. | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 4 | ||