Thread Closed

Mersenne prime

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct22-09, 07:00 AM   #1
 

Mersenne prime


I was trying to prove the statement "If (2^n)-1 is prime then n is prime". I've already seen the proof using factorisation of the difference of integers and getting a contradiction, but I was trying to use groups instead. I was wondering if it's possible, since I keep getting stuck.
So far I've got:
If (2^n)-1=p where p is prime then [tex]2^{n}\equiv1 mod(p)[/tex]. The group {1,2,...,p-1} is cyclic and every element has order p-1. So n = k(p-1) for some positive integer k. But doesn't this mean n is not prime? which is wrong I know. Could someone point me in the right direction or a theorem that might be useful?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Oct23-09, 11:56 PM   #2
 
Interesting problem... I'm not yet sure of a proof, but your statement

Quote by Bleys View Post
The group {1,2,...,p-1} is cyclic and every element has order p-1.
is wrong. All you know is that every element has an order that divides p-1. (E.g. for p=7 the element 2 has order 3).
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Mersenne prime
Thread Forum Replies
Order of 3 modulo a Mersenne prime Linear & Abstract Algebra 4
TWO new Mersenne primes? Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
New Mersenne numbers conjecture Linear & Abstract Algebra 4
M43: GIMPS project has found a new Mersenne prime Linear & Abstract Algebra 15
The GIMPS project has found a new Mersenne prime number: M42. Linear & Abstract Algebra 4