Einstein's Theory: Time Doesn't Slow Down Relative to Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryDaniels
  • Start date Start date
HarryDaniels
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
(move this to my other question please)
As Einstein said that time slows down relative to velocity and he also said that all frames are equally important, then how is the following correct.

If I were in a rocket traveling away from Earth at a distance of V and the Earth was the frame of reference, I would be movinig away at a higher speed and therefor my time would be going slower. But, if the rocket was the frame of reference then the Earth would be moving at a speed of V (where both V's equal the same number). So, in relation to the rocket as the frame, the Earth's time is slowing down so the times even out and become locked, indefinately, so time doesn't slow down at all. This is proven by Einsteins own thought. So time never slows down as it just depends on the frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there are dozens and dozens of this same question...do a search for many discussions here . ..TWIN PARADOX...should turn up many.

It is the frame that undergoes accelerated motion which is the "slow" one...the frames are not equal.
 
Naty1 said:
It is the frame that undergoes accelerated motion which is the "slow" one...the frames are not equal.

This is broadly correct. But both frames could accelerate and still show a time difference when they get back together. It's not the acceleration per se that causes the differential proper times.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top