Is the Polarity on the Voltmeter Wrong for this Mutual Induction Example?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azaharak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the polarity of the voltmeter in a mutual induction example. The original poster questions whether the voltmeter's readings are correct based on the direction of current flow and induced EMF. A participant clarifies that the voltmeter indicates the voltage drop across a resistor, which aligns with conventional current flow from positive to negative. The original poster realizes they misinterpreted the voltmeter as the source instead of recognizing the inductor coil as the effective source. The clarification helps resolve the confusion regarding the current direction and voltmeter readings.
azaharak
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
Hi

Is it me, or is the polarity on the voltmeter wrong for this mutual induction example.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/indmut.html

In particular the 2nd and 3rd images of the first page Coupled Inductors.

I agree with the change in B field and induced current direction, but the current that is drawn in the 2nd image should be consistent with a negative EMF in the voltmeter since current travels from + to -.

Same reasoning in the 3rd image down.

Thanks

Az
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they are indicating the voltage drop across the resistor, which always goes + to - in the direction of current.
 
Thanks..


For some dumb reason, I didn't see the resistor and was treating the voltmeter as the source.

The inductor coil should be the effective source, and the current flows out of the positive terminal through the load, to the negative terminal.

Thanks again

Az
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top