Cosmological redshift as a Doppler effect or metric evolution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether cosmological redshift should be viewed solely as a kinematic Doppler effect or as a result of the time dynamics of metric space. It highlights that for distant objects, the curvature of space-time is essential for accurate redshift calculations, while for closer objects, the relativistic Doppler effect suffices. As distances approach a Hubble radius, relying only on the Doppler effect becomes inadequate, necessitating consideration of space-time curvature. The conversation suggests that both perspectives may need to converge for a comprehensive understanding. Ultimately, the treatment of redshift requires careful consideration of both kinematic and metric factors.
AWA
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
In several threads where I've seen the redshift issue discussed there's been some confusion about this point, Must we treat cosmological redshift as a purely kinematic (relativistic)doppler effect or as the time dymamics of the metric space? Or both views can be made to converge?
 
Space news on Phys.org
AWA said:
In several threads where I've seen the redshift issue discussed there's been some confusion about this point, Must we treat cosmological redshift as a purely kinematic (relativistic)doppler effect or as the time dymamics of the metric space? Or both views can be made to converge?
There's no question that for distant objects, one has to take into account the curvature of space-time to get the right answer for the redshift. For nearer objects, this just reduces to a relativistic doppler effect. When you start getting out to around a Hubble radius, however, this starts to become rather wrong and you have to take into account the space-time curvature.
 
Back
Top