Neil Turok's All Known Physics Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter FyzxRulz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Neil Turok's equation, claiming to encompass "all known physics," is not applicable for high school physics students in grades 11 and 12. The discussion highlights that the complexities of the equation, including quantum path integrals, are beyond the curriculum typically covered at that level. Participants express skepticism about the practicality of using such advanced concepts for basic physics problems. The consensus is that high school physics focuses on foundational principles rather than advanced theoretical frameworks. Overall, the equation's ambitious claims do not align with the educational needs of high school students.
FyzxRulz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Sorry if i posted in the wrong forum, but i have a question. Some of you may know this equation:

allknownphysics1.png



Is it possible to use it for simple gr11 and 12 physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No you do not learn about any of those things in high school.
 
I know, but can you still use it, since it's "all known physics"
 
Who would want to use it? All known physics is a rather boastful claim but disregarding their marketing statements why would you want to use a quantum path integral to calculate the motion of the heavens?
 
no you don't use it in gr11 or 12 physic, i doubt that its even used in first year physic...b/c i never seen em
 

Thread 'Why can't Solar panels be hemispherical, or a curved strip type?'

comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
View full post »

Thread 'The Physics of unloading sand from a barge'

I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Existential problem on Electromagnetism and the combination of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Is the CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory the Key to Solving the Antimatter Mystery?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B What is the physical significance of mass-time-length equivalences in physics?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I How is the Reynolds number derived (is my derivation wrong)?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Neil Turok: all known physics fits into one equation
Replies
7
Views
14K
B Andy Meadowcroft - Introduction (and a question about nuclear fusion)
Replies
12
Views
2K
Can an iPhone placed inside a water tank receive wireless LAN signals?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Physics equations with the mathematical constant Phi?
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Sticky
Insights How to Avoid Breaking Physics With Your “What If” Question
Replies
3
Views
14K
I Airflow direction -- Improving the cooling of my computer
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top