Pauli exclusion principle between 2 identical fermions

scope
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hi,

can we say that the Pauli exclusion principle between 2 identical fermions implies logically entanglement because of the antisymmetric wavefunction, that can not be factorized as a tensor product:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slater_determinant
"However, it is not satisfactory for fermions, such as electrons, because the wave function is not antisymmetric"

?
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


thank you very much for the link, but I was wondering if the exclusion principle implies logically entanglement for 2 identical fermions.
thank you!
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Two hydrogen atoms and Pauli's exclusion principle
Replies
17
Views
3K
I Pauli exclusion principle and Hermitian operators
Replies
15
Views
2K
I How does the Pauli exclusion principle work?
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Collision of identical fermions
Replies
18
Views
2K
A Virtual Fermions and Pauli Principle
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Weakly interacting electrons in an atom
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Bypassing Pauli Exclusion principle.
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Pauli exclusion principle explained
Replies
2
Views
2K
Pauli's exclusion principle
Replies
2
Views
2K
Pauli exclusion principle question (again)
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top