Limit to number of standing waves in pipes?

AI Thread Summary
Each pipe has a limit to the number of harmonics it can produce, determined by the relationship between frequency and wavelength. As harmonics increase, the wavelength decreases, but there is a theoretical minimum wavelength related to molecular vibrations. When wavelengths approach this limit, the classical equations of wave behavior become less applicable. This limit results in higher frequencies that exceed the audible range for humans. Ultimately, while there is a maximum number of harmonics, practical constraints arise at very high frequencies.
eknox123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a conceptual question I had not related to a specific problem- so I know with each higher harmonic in pipes that the frequency increases a certain amount (the fundamental frequency- and that in pipes closed at one end skips the even harmonics). However I also know that frequency is inversely proportionate to wavelength. So each successive harmonic has a smaller wavelength. But since there's a limit (I assume) to how small a wavelength can be, does each pipe have its own limit in terms of the number of harmonics that can be made in it?


Homework Equations


v= wavelength * frequency


The Attempt at a Solution


As I wrote above, I'm guessing there is a limit- like the highest harmonic is the one with the lowest non-zero wavelength (that will be the highest frequency), but I'm not sure if my class is oversimplifying it, and really there are exceptions or something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi eknox123! welcome to pf! :wink:
eknox123 said:
… frequency is inversely proportionate to wavelength. So each successive harmonic has a smaller wavelength. But since there's a limit (I assume) to how small a wavelength can be, does each pipe have its own limit in terms of the number of harmonics that can be made in it?

i suppose that when you get near the molecular level, the random thermal vibrations predominate, and the equations stop working, and so you can't have wavelengths shorter than that …

but I'm guessing that's a lot higher-pitched than any ear can hear! :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top