Laws of Physics may change across the Universe

AI Thread Summary
New evidence suggests that the laws of physics may vary across the universe, challenging Einstein's equivalence principle. Observations indicate that a fundamental constant of nature could differ in various cosmic regions, implying that our universe might be uniquely suited for life. This finding, led by John Webb from the University of New South Wales, reveals a surprising "preferred direction" or axis in the cosmos, a concept previously dismissed over a century ago. The implications of these results could significantly alter our understanding of the universe's fundamental structure. Such discussions highlight the ongoing exploration of cosmological principles and their potential variability.
AdkinsJr
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Interesting article in Newscientists, thought I'd start a discussion...


New evidence supports the idea that we live in an area of the universe that is "just right" for our existence. The controversial finding comes from an observation that one of the constants of nature appears to be different in different parts of the cosmos.

If correct, this result stands against Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that the laws of physics are the same everywhere. "This finding was a real surprise to everyone," says John Webb of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. Webb is lead author on the new paper, which has been submitted to Physical Review Letters.

Even more surprising is the fact that the change in the constant appears to have an orientation, creating a "preferred direction", or axis, across the cosmos. That idea was dismissed more than 100 years ago with the creation of Einstein's special theory of relativity


http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19429-laws-of-physics-may-change-across-the-universe.html
 
Space news on Phys.org
There are several other threads on this topic in the Cosmology sub-forum.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top