The Convolution of Detla Functions

AI Thread Summary
The convolution of delta functions, specifically δ[y-a] * δ[y-b], results in δ[y-a-b] in both continuous and discrete cases. This is derived from the integral property of delta functions, where the convolution effectively evaluates the integrand at specific points. The process remains consistent regardless of whether the delta function is continuous or discrete. The discussion confirms that the integral form can be applied directly to achieve the desired result. This understanding is crucial for applications involving delta functions in mathematical analysis.
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hi,

I have encountered with this:

\delta[y-a]*\delta[y-b]

where a and b are positive real numbers, and * denotes convolution. How to do this in both continuous and discrete cases? In Wikipedia, they say that:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(\zeta-x)\delta(x-\eta)\,dx=\delta(\zeta-\eta)

Can I use this result, so that:

\delta[y-a]*\delta[y-b]=\delta[y-b-a]?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
>Can I use this result

Yes. The convolution delta(y-a)*delta(y-b) is an integral over s of delta(s-a) delta(y-s-b). This integrand is zero everywhere except where s = a, thus it yields delta(y-a-b).

It's the same whether it's a continuous delta function (an infinitely thin and high peak) undergoing an integral, or a discrete delta (of height 1 at an integer) undergoing a summation. When integrated, delta(zeta - x) picks out the value of the integrand where x=zeta, yielding delta(zeta - eta). It's the same if you consider the other delta function picking out the integrand at a particular x.
 
Last edited:
Goongyae said:
>Can I use this result

Yes. The convolution delta(y-a)*delta(y-b) is an integral over s of delta(s-a) delta(y-s-b). This integrand is zero everywhere except where s = a, thus it yields delta(y-a-b).

It's the same whether it's a continuous delta function (an infinitely thin and high peak) undergoing an integral, or a discrete delta (of height 1 at an integer) undergoing a summation. When integrated, delta(zeta - x) picks out the value of the integrand where x=zeta, yielding delta(zeta - eta). It's the same if you consider the other delta function picking out the integrand at a particular x.

Ok, thank you very much.

Regards
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top