Maximum potential (coaxial cable)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the maximum potential in a coaxial cable occurs when the inner conductor's radius a equals b/e, where b is the outer conductor's radius and e is the base of the natural logarithm. The user applies Gauss's Law to derive the electric field E between the conductors and calculates the potential difference V as a function of the radii. They express V in terms of the logarithm of the ratio of the outer to inner radius. The user seeks assistance in differentiating V with respect to a to find the maximum potential condition. Clarification on this differentiation process is requested to complete the proof.
weesiang_loke
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a coaxial cable with outer conductor of radius b, and inner conductor of radius a. Prove that maximum potential is obtained when a = b /e, e is base of natural log.

Homework Equations


gauss law, ...

The Attempt at a Solution


By using Gauss Law,
for a < r < b,
i have E = 2*k*\lambda / r, where \lambda = Q/L

then the potential difference, V= \int E dr
V = 2*k*\lambda ln (b/a),

but i am not sure how to continue by differentiating V wrt a.
Help me pls...
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone pls help ...
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top