Entanglement between the Future and the Past in the Quantum Vacuum

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of entanglement between the future and past in the quantum vacuum, highlighting that massless fields can be quantized as independent systems within light cones. The vacuum is identified as a nonseparable state, reflecting entanglement similar to that observed in spacelike separated Rindler wedges, introducing the idea of timelike entanglement. An inertial detector is proposed to demonstrate a thermal response to the vacuum when activated at t=0, indicating potential for experimental observation. The discussion emphasizes that the entangled entities are better understood as field degrees of freedom rather than traditional particles. This exploration opens avenues for further research and experimentation in quantum physics.
limarodessa
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hello all ! Help me please. I can not understand – which particles are entangled in this case

http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v106/i11/e110404

We note that massless fields within the future and past light cone may be quantized as independent systems. The vacuum is shown to be a nonseparable state of these systems, exactly mirroring the known entanglement between the spacelike separated Rindler wedges. This leads to a notion of timelike entanglement. We describe an inertial detector which exhibits a thermal response to the vacuum when switched on at t=0, due to this property. The feasibility of detecting this effect is discussed, with natural experimental parameters appearing at the scale of 100 GHz.
Full text here http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1003/1003.0720v1.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case, it is easier to think of it as if the entangled objects are not particles, but the field degrees of freedom.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...